[77] See Baillet, _Jugemens des savans_ (Amsterdam, 1725), IIA, p. 24. This book was first published in 1685-1686. For Sallo's review see _Le Journal des sçavans_, Feb. 2, 1665. [78] Morhof cites Placcius's plan in the passage quoted in n. 76 above. [79] _Sacra bibliothecarum illustrium arcana retecta_ (Augsburg, 1668. ICN), p. 344. He says of his additions: "Quam multa in ea [_Bibliotheca bibliothecarum_] Bibliothecarum pariter ac Authorum qui de iisdem scripsere nomina desideruntur, ex nostro hocce supplemento apparebit" (p. 351). [80] A copy in the Bibliothèque nationale. For a bibliographical description see Augustin and Aloys De Backer and Carlos Sommervogel, _Bibliothèque de la Compagnie de Jésus_ (nouvelle édition; Brussels, 1894), V, col. 1535, No. 44. [81] See Reimann, Versuch, I, 227 and 229. There are copies of this book in the University of Chicago Library (in part, at least, a later edition) and my own library. Reimann's mention of the wretched _Bibliographia_ shakes one's faith in his critical judgment. The _Bibliographia_, an unauthorized edition of J. H. Boecler's orientation lectures at Strassburg, was first printed in 1677 and reprinted in 1696. It deserved neither publication nor reprinting. In 1715 J. G. Krause added new materials from Boecler's lecture notes and improved the quality of the critical remarks without remedying the bibliographical defects. This new edition was entitled _Bibliographica critica_ (Leipzig, 1715). There are copies of the 1677 and 1715 editions in the Newberry Library and in my own library. [82] See _Catalogus_, p. [4]. He estimates the number of bibliographies in the _Bibliotheca bibliothecarum_ at eight hundred and in his own book at fifteen hundred. [83] See as examples the entries Rudolphus Hospinianus (_Catalogus_, p. 285) and Samuel Rachelius (_Catalogus_, p. 287). [84] He writes Guilielmus Ersengrenius (_Catalogus_, p. 187). The name is Eysengreinus. He omits Labbé's incomplete reference to a philological bibliography; see note 10 in this chapter. [85] In casually turning the pages of the _Catalogus_, I note Moroffius for Morhoffius (p. 39), the omission of Claudius Chelemont (p. 49) in the list of Cistercian bibliographers (p. 296), Christophorus Hemdrich for C. Hendreich (p. 45), Ioannes Seldemel for Ioannes Seldenus (p. 361). Alfonsus de Roxas (p. 9) and the Orden de la Merced are not mentioned in the bibliographies of religious orders (pp. 295-296). [86] Theodore Besterman estimates the number at 3000, but this must include the biographies. A generous guess would be 1500. [87] See A. W. Pollard and G. R. Redgrave, _A Short-Title Catalogue_ (London, 1926), No. 13582. Teissier calls him Hugo Hollandus for some reason. Since the _Auctuarium_ is arranged according to first names, this is an annoying mistake. [88] _Ioannis Rossi Antiquarii Warwicensis historia Regum Angliae. E codice MS. in Bibliotheca Bodleiana descripsit, notisque & indice adornauit_ Thom. Hearne (Oxford, 1716).