“I then said that I trusted, as his lordship had been of the
honourable council of the late king Edward, consenting and agreeing
to acts concerning faith towards God and religion, under great pain,
would not so soon after consent to put poor men to shameful deaths
for believing what he had then professed. To this he answered that
he, with the lord Windsor, lord Dacres, and others, did not consent
to those acts, and that their refusal would be seen as long as the
parliament-house stood. He then rehearsed the misfortune of the
dukes of Northumberland and Suffolk, with others, because they
favoured not the true religion; and again the prosperity of the
queen’s highness, because she favoured the true religion; thereby
gathering the one to be good, and of God, and the other to be wicked,
and of the devil; and said that the duke of Northumberland confessed
so plainly.”
And thus have you heard the whole trouble which George Marsh
sustained both at Latham and also at Lancaster. While at Latham it
was falsely reported that he had consented, and agreed in all things
with the earl and his council; and while at Lancaster, many came to
talk with him, giving him such counsel as Peter gave Christ: but he
answered that he could not follow their counsel, but that by God’s
grace he would live and die with a pure conscience, and as hitherto
he had believed and professed.
Within a few days after, the said Marsh was removed from Lancaster;
and coming to Chester, was sent for by Dr. Cotes, then bishop, to
appear before him in his hall, nobody being present but they twain.
Then he asked him certain questions concerning the sacrament, and
Marsh made such answers as seemed to content the bishop, saving that
he utterly denied transubstantiation, and allowed not the abuse of
the mass, nor that the lay people should receive under one kind only,
contrary to Christ’s institution: in which points the bishop went
about to persuade him, howbeit, (God be thanked,) all in vain. Much
other talk he had with him, to move him to submit himself to the
universal church of Rome; and when he could not prevail he sent him
to prison again. And after, being there, came to him divers times,
one Massie, a fatherly old man, one Wrench the schoolmaster, one
Hensham the bishop’s chaplain, and the archdeacon, with many more;
who, with much philosophy, worldly wisdom, and deceitful vanity,
after the tradition of men, but not after Christ, endeavoured to
persuade him to submit himself to the church of Rome, to acknowledge
the pope as its head, and to interpret the Scripture no otherwise
than that church did.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account