Deeper-lying causes were at work, however. The damage from any single
event could have been repaired if there had been wholesome vigor in
the Spanish political organization, as there was and as there is still
among the Spaniards as a people. It was the fortune of Spain, at this
critical period of her history, to have the control of affairs vested
in the hands of rulers who were negligent of her condition, by the
distraction of their interests or by natural incompetence, and who
wasted her resources. The framework of government offered no chance
for good councils to reach the monarch’s ears. Men of business sense
were excluded from office even in the towns, so far as possible, and
were a rarity in the national parliament; power lay in the hands of lay
and ecclesiastical lords who had inherited feudal ideas, the reverse
of business-like, from the earlier period of the crusade against
the Moors, and who had no understanding of the measures needed for
industrial development. There can be little doubt that the prime evil
from which Spain suffered was (as it still is) bad government.
=201. The burden of taxes.=—The chief political abuse appeared in
the form of taxes so burdensome in their amount and in the method of
collection that industry was stifled. Taxes increased so rapidly in the
sixteenth century that in 1594 it was asserted that they amounted to
30 per cent on a man’s property, and that farmers could not exist no
matter how small a rent they paid; they left Spain or went to prison.
The “alcabala,” a tax supposed to be 10 per cent on a ware every time
it was bought and sold, was raised until it absorbed most of the
profits of trade and was a leading factor in the decline of industry.
A Spanish author of the eighteenth century (Ulloa) shows that a man
engaged in the manufacture of a certain stuff would have had to pay in
taxes actually more than he earned; “hence it follows that he would
have gained more by making nothing, and in Spain it is profitable not
to work.” Some industries, more fortunate, paid 60 per cent or 40 per
cent of the value of the goods as a tax to the government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account