=34. Restrictions imposed to insure security. The market.=—The dangers
of travel required a merchant to go in company with others, and the
danger that a merchant would himself turn robber made it necessary
for him to subject himself constantly to public supervision, and to
get residents who would act as sureties for his good behavior. In
England, even in the eleventh century, the central government thought
it necessary to pass a law “that every man above twelve years of age
make oath that he will neither be a thief nor cognizant of theft.” Such
a general statute would surely be of little use.
Many other statutes of a more specific nature were passed, which may
have helped to repress robbery, but which must have hampered trade
at the same time. The idea in general was to force a man to make his
purchases in public, so that if he appeared at home with new wares he
could get witnesses to prove that he came honestly by them. Cattle
formed a large part of the personal property in early times, and as
these could readily be stolen, many laws were passed restricting
the trade in cattle. Other things were included in the restriction,
however, as the need of protecting commerce became more apparent. In
England, in the tenth century, a man was not allowed to buy or sell any
goods above the value of twenty pence, unless he did it within a town
where a public official and witnesses could legitimate the bargain. In
this practice is found the origin of the market, a medieval institution
of which more will be said later. A market was a place appointed by
the government, where bargains could properly be made; and only small
exchanges of household produce could be made outside it, in the open
country. Beginning in the need that was felt to prevent thieving it
developed as a public institution, which the people found it profitable
to extend as a means of collecting tolls and of regulating internal
trade.
=35. Society organized to exist with the minimum of commerce; the
medieval village.=—The striking and important feature in the life of
European peoples at this period was not the large amount of commerce
carried on, but the small amount. The people were organized on a system
which enabled them to support life with the least commerce possible.
Instead of being concentrated in towns, they were isolated in little
groups, often called manors, one of which would be composed often of
less than 100 people, who got their living from the square mile or
so of land surrounding them. It is not necessary here to discuss the
social and political life of these little groups, though it is proper
to remark that often some of the inhabitants were slaves, and many more
were only half-free, like the Russian serfs of the nineteenth century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account