=37. Evils resulting from the lack of commerce.=—Before we proceed to
describe the growth of European commerce from such origins it will be
well to stop and consider the results of a system which was based on
the lack of commerce. With regard to the main product, food staples,
the result was an alternation of _waste_ and _want_. A good year
brought a surplus for which there was no market outside the village,
and which could not be worked up inside for lack of manufacturing
skill and implements. A bad harvest, on the other hand, meant serious
suffering, because there was no opportunity to buy food supplies
outside the manor and bring them to it. Nearly every year was marked
by a famine in one part or another of a country, and famine was often
followed by pestilence. Diseases now almost unknown in the civilized
world, like leprosy and ergotism or St. Anthony’s fire, were not
infrequent. The food at best was coarse and monotonous; the houses were
mere hovels of boughs and mud; the clothes were a few garments of rude
stuff. Nothing better could be procured so long as everything had to be
produced on the spot and made ready for use by the people themselves.
Finally, these people were coarse and ignorant, with little regard
for personal cleanliness or for moral laws, and with practically no
interests outside the narrow bounds of the little village in which they
lived.
=38. Exceptional instances of higher organization of industry.=—These
conditions existed all over western Europe, and may be taken as typical
of the period about the year 1000. Though they determined the commerce,
or better the lack of commerce, at this time, they were not absolutely
universal. Great feudal princes and great monasteries owned each a
considerable number of villages or manors, and tried to introduce a
more advanced economic system among them. A great lord would have
his shoemaker and tailor, his saddler, swordsmith, etc.; and would
have a considerable number of women gathered in a sort of factory
making clothes. It is noteworthy, however, that the difficulties of
transportation were so great that for a long time to come it was not
practicable to concentrate the food supplies of a large group of manors
in one place, and the owner would have to go to the food instead of
having it brought to him. So we read of the kings and princes being
always on the road, traveling with court and retinue from one manor to
another, eating up the surplus that had accumulated and then moving on.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account