=47. The “foreign” trade of this period was that between towns, even in
the same country.=—The student who has begun the history of commerce
with the notion, as common as it is erroneous, that the foreign trade
of a country is more important than its internal trade, and who is
impatient to arrive at the description of this foreign trade, will be
disappointed to learn that even in the latter part of the Middle Ages
it scarcely existed in the modern sense. We mean now by foreign trade
that between states—between the United States and Germany, for example.
In the manorial period, as has been suggested, foreign trade was rather
that which existed between manors. In the period under discussion it
was that which existed between towns. The towns existing inside the
boundaries of a modern European country did not, it is true, differ
as much among themselves, in their products, as they differed, taking
them altogether, from the towns of another country. But the expense
of transportation restricted most trade still to a comparatively
small radius, and the town, rather than the country, was the natural
trading unit. The radius of profitable trade, for most articles, was
so small that an English town would have its most important commercial
relations with the other English towns rather than with the towns of
foreign countries. The town, moreover, was the unit for regulating
trade. Each town would have its own customs tariff, and to a merchant
of London it made little difference whether he traded with Southampton
or with Paris; national regulation was less important than municipal.
Climatic and historical influences, it is true, made a clearly marked
distinction between the great sections of Europe, the North and the
South, the East and the West, and we shall have to take up some of
these sections in detail; but we shall use our time most effectively
by spending it not on the features of trade in the different modern
countries considered separately, but on the characteristics of trade
common to all the advanced countries.
=48. Small size of the medieval towns.=—A point deserving special
emphasis in the description of the medieval town is this, that though
the town comprised practically all the mercantile and manufacturing
population of a country, and though it marked a tremendous advance over
the village, yet the town was a very small affair when measured by
modern standards. In England in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries
the average size of the first class of towns was probably below 5,000
inhabitants; few had more than 10,000 and many had less than 1,000.
On the Continent, in the last centuries of the Middle Ages, even
celebrated cities like Nuremberg and Strassburg had not over 20,000
inhabitants. Frankfort on the Main had scarcely 10,000, and other
cities which played a great part in economic and political history had
even less.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account