The important and difficult subject of the development of capitalistic
organization is treated by John A. Hobson, *Evolution of modern
capitalism, new ed., 1916, chap. 1, W. Sombart, **The quintessence
of capitalism: a study of the history and psychology of the modern
business man, London, 1915, and by Pirenne, *The stages in the social
history of capitalism, American Hist. Rev., Apr. 1914, 19: 494-515.
One aspect of the subject is covered by Arthur H. Woolf, Short history
of accountants and accountancy, London, 1912.
CHAPTER XIV
COMMERCE AND POLITICS IN THE LATER MIDDLE AGES
=138. Development of the modern political system in the later Middle
Ages.=—Toward the close of the Middle Ages the feudal system of
government gave place gradually to a system more like that which the
Romans had established and with which we are familiar now. As trade and
intercommunication increased, and towns grew up holding a population
of considerable wealth, the kings found it possible to make into a
reality the position of nominal headship which tradition and the church
conferred upon them. They found in the mercantile and manufacturing
classes people who could afford to pay taxes, and who were willing to
pay large sums to be relieved from the oppressions of the feudal lords.
It became possible once more to transport supplies and to send troops
to distant localities, and the kings devised means by which they could
keep in touch with their officials, and hold them to loyal service. The
result was a great increase in the power of the central government, at
the expense of the feudal lords.
=139. Variety of development in different countries.=—The development,
as sketched above, was very different in the different countries. It
came early in England, and local lords lost practically all of their
independence. In France it was a very gradual process, extending over
the last four centuries of the Middle Ages. Even in the sixteenth
century and later, the kings, though they seemed to enjoy great power,
did not abolish all the remnants of feudalism, which continued down
to the French Revolution in 1789, to the great harm of industrial
development. In Spain the union of the crowns of Castile and Aragon
just before 1500 completed the process, by establishing nearly
absolute royal authority over the greater part of the peninsula. In
Germany and Italy the result was different. The same man, who called
himself the Emperor of the Romans, claimed the royal power in both
countries, but in attempting too much he lost everything. He wasted the
royal resources in vain attempt to establish his authority, and became
a mere figure-head. The control of government passed in those countries
to local authorities; but it is important to note that these included
not only feudal lords, but also cities which had become strong enough
to throw off feudal authority and to establish for themselves almost
complete independence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account