=140. Effect on commerce of a strong and of a weak central
government.=—In a country in which the cities established complete
independence they seemed for a time to have gained by throwing off
the royal power. Each city could control its affairs and shape its
policy to suit local interests; and the great cities of Italy and
Germany before the close of the Middle Ages were the most advanced
and prosperous parts of Europe. Though they controlled only small
areas of land they had great resources from their commerce, and even
in war could hold their own with the feudal lords fighting in the
old-fashioned way.
They were strong enough to fight a feudal lord; they were not, however,
strong enough to fight a modern king. While they were building up
their power at the expense of rival cities and at the expense of the
country districts, the kings of lands to the west of them were quietly
engaged in uniting all the cities and the country districts, too, under
one rule. The cities in France and England seemed for a time to lose,
because they were forced by the kings to make concessions to each other
and to the country districts. When, however, they had become used
to consider themselves as only parts of a bigger whole, the nation,
they found that their sovereign was far better fitted to represent
their interests and further their progress than any one of them was
individually. The struggle of the independent cities of Italy and
Germany against the national states of England, Spain, and France was
not decided until after the discovery of America and the sea-route to
Asia, when the national organization proved decisively its superiority
to the municipal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account