A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
taste by insinuating praises of himself in an address to the divinity.
We turn to these, and we find as nearly as possible nothing critical.
Glimmers of interest appear, as in the description of historians (ii.
513), as “those between poetry and rhetoric,” but they are
extinguished almost at once. It would be quite impossible to treat the
comedy question from a less literary standpoint than that of
Aristides; we might have Plutarch speaking, except that the writing is
more “precious” and _point-de-vice_. The “Apology for my blunder”
consists mainly in a string, by no means lacking in ingenuity, of
citations from poets, orators, and others, in which they indulge,
either for themselves or their personages, in strains somewhat
self-laudatory. As for the more than four hundred pages of “On
Rhetoric” and “For the Four,” they also avoid the literary handling,
the strictly critical grip of the subject, with a persistency which,
as has been observed in other cases, is simply a mystery, unless we
suppose that the writer was either laboriously shunning this, or quite
unconscious of its possibility and promise. Pages after pages on the
old _aporia_ whether Rhetoric is an art or not, sheets after sheets on
the welldoing of the Four, on Plato’s evil-speaking, we have. But,
unless I have missed it, never a passage on the magnificent literature
with which Rhetoric has enriched Greece, on the more magnificent
rhetoric which the accuser of the brethren has himself displayed in
accusing her. To a man of the subtlety of Aristides, of his enthusiasm
for literature, of his _flair_ for a popular and striking paradox, one
would imagine that this beating up of the enemy’s quarters would be
irresistibly tempting. But it is certainly not in his main attack: and
though, in the vast stretch of wiredrawn argument and precious
expression, one may have missed something, I do not think that it is
even in the reserves or the parentheses.
Footnote 156:
Ed. cit., i. 751.
Footnote 157:
Ibid., ii. 1.
Footnote 158:
Ibid., ii. 156-414.
Footnote 159:
Ibid., ii. 491-542.
Footnote 160:
There is enough of the spirit of Sir Fretful in Aristides here to make
the quotation irresistible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account