A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
“I believe that the reason why schoolboys and students become such fools
is, that they never see or hear of anything to which we are accustomed
in the actual world. They are occupied by pirates standing on the beach
with chains in their hands, by tyrants ordaining that sons shall cut
their fathers’ heads off, by oracles against a pestilence to the effect
that three or more virgins are to be sacrificed, by little bundles of
words smeared with honey, and everything, as it were, powdered with
poppy-seed and sesamum. For people bred in this fashion sense is as
impossible as a pleasant odour for those who live in the kitchen.[305]
If you will excuse my saying so, you rhetoricians were the first to ruin
literature. By exciting ridicule of [_or_ playing tricks with] your
light and empty phrases,[306] you weakened and prostrated the whole body
of oratory. Youth had not yet been enslaved to declamations when
Sophocles and Euripides devised the words in which they were to speak.
The private schoolmaster[307] had not spoilt good wits when Pindar and
the Nine Lyrists feared to sing in Homeric verse. And not to allege
poets only, I certainly find it nowhere said that Plato and Demosthenes
betook themselves to this kind of eloquence. Oratory full grown, and, if
I may say so, in her maidenhood, is not spotted and swelling [like a
toad], but shoots up in natural beauty.
Footnote 305:
Or “good taste is as impossible as good smell to those,” &c. I have
not hit on any satisfactory English equivalents for _sapere_ (with its
double sense) and _bene olere_. What is meant, of course, is that the
power of distinguishing is lost in the vicious atmosphere.
Footnote 306:
_Ludibria quædam excitando._
Footnote 307:
_Umbraticus doctor_, which Ben Jonson Englishes directly as
“umbratical doctors” in the _Discoveries_, and De Quincey rather
hardily converts to a compliment in his _Essay on Rhetoric_.
“Of late this windy and extravagant loquacity has shifted from Asia to
Athens, and has breathed upon the aspiring minds of youth like a
pestilential star, and forthwith true eloquence, its rule corrupted, has
been arrested, and put to silence. Tell me, who has since equalled the
fame of Thucydides, of Hyperides? Not so much as a lyric of wholesome
complexion has appeared, and everything, as if poisoned with the same
food, has been unable to last to a natural grey old age. Even painting
has made no better end, since the audacity of the Egyptians has cut so
great an art down to shorthand.”
The rhetorician Agamemnon defends scholastic procedure by the old plan
of throwing the blame on parents and the like; but the story quickly
turns to one of its more than “picaresque” episodes, and the subject
drops.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account