A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
of something like formal critical examination of particular books and
authors that Greek preserves for us in Dionysius of Halicarnassus.
It is, however, extremely rash to conclude, as has sometimes been
concluded, that because we find so much tendency towards [Sidenote:
_Other criticism in Comedy._] literary criticism in Aristophanes, we
should find a proportionate amount in other Comic writers (at least in
those of the Old Comedy, who had perhaps most genius and certainly most
_parrhesia_), if their works existed. The contrary opinion is far more
probable. For though we have nothing but fragments, often insignificant
in individual bulk, of the writers of the Old Comedy except
Aristophanes, and of all the writers of the Middle—nothing but
fragments, though sometimes not insufficient in bulk, of Menander,
Philemon, and the other writers of the New—yet it must be remembered
that these fragments are extremely numerous, and that in a very
considerable number of cases, fragments as they are, they give a fair
glimpse of context and general tone. I do not hesitate to say, after
most careful examination of the collections of Meineke and his
successors, that there are not more than one or two faint and doubtful
approaches to our subject discoverable there. The passage of
Pherecrates[27] on which M. Egger chiefly relies to prove his very wide
assertion that “il n’y a peut-être pas un seul poète” of the Old Comedy
“qui n’ait mêlé la critique littéraire à ses fictions comiques” deals
with music, not literature. And it is exceedingly rash to argue from
titles, which, as we know from those of the plays remaining to us in
their entirety, bore as little necessary relation to contents in ancient
as in modern times.
Footnote 27:
This passage, which is twenty-five lines long, is from the play
_Chiron_, and may be found at p. 110 of the Didot edition of Meineke’s
_Poet. Com. Græc. Fragmenta_. Egger (p. 40) only gives it in
translation. It is not in the least literary but wholly _musical_ in
subject, Music appearing in person and complaining of the alteration
of the lyre from seven strings to twelve.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account