A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Yet the value of the two main documents is so inestimable, that if the
incompleteness and the shortcomings of the _Poetics_, the unavoidable
irrelevance of much of the _Rhetoric_, [Sidenote: _Value of the two main
treatises._] were far greater than they are, our gratitude for both
would still be hard to exaggerate. We have here not merely the first
constituting documents, the earliest charters at once and discussions of
European criticism, but we have them from the hand of a master whose
very weaknesses make him, as compared with some other masters, specially
fit for the office of critic. For the magnificent but almost always _a
priori_ and unpractical metaphysics of Plato, for the shrewd but
personal and rather unfair polemic of Aristophanes, we have a patient
examination of a subject in itself so rich and varied, that one regrets
having to point out that its riches and its variety are not quite
exhaustive. Nowhere, perhaps, does Aristotle sketch the actual _Wesen_
of the man of letters with the dæmonic completeness of the author of the
extraordinary passage attributed to Simylus and quoted formerly; but
that might be, and probably is, a mere flash. His own conclusions, only
sometimes inadequate, very seldom positively erroneous, exhibit the true
modes of criticism as perhaps they have never been exhibited since—with
an equal combination of patience and of power. It is impossible for
Aristotle to do harm, unless his principles are not merely taken too
literally, but augmented and falsified, as was done by the “classical”
criticism of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. It is impossible
for any one who undertakes the office of a critic to omit the study of
him without very great harm. Let us first review briefly what seem to be
the shortcomings, accidental or essential, of his performance, and then
set down what its better parts establish for us as the state of Literary
Criticism at the close of the first and greatest age of Greek
literature, at the close of the first age of the literature of Europe as
a whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account