A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 1 (of 3), Classical and mediæval criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Aphthonius adopts the same divisions of Progymnasmata, save that he
makes them fourteen instead of twelve, by [Sidenote: _Aphthonius._]
separating ἀνασκευὴ [rebutting] from κατασκευὴ [confirming], and adding
a section on Blame. His object was evidently to make even the
business-like handling of his predecessor more precise still; and the
long and revived popularity which, as has been said, he achieved, was
not an undue reward for one of the most craftsmanlike crambooks that
ever deserved the encomium of the epithet and the discredit of the noun.
Aphthonius substitutes for the simple heading “Of Myth,” &c.,
“_Definition_ of Myth,” &c.; and though he still keeps his sections very
short, he manages, instead of the rather brachygraphic indication of
examples in the text, to give an appendix of complete if miniature
pattern at the end of each section—a fable of the ants and grasshoppers,
urging youth to industry, for the first; the story of the rose and its
acquiring redness from the blood of Aphrodite when she struck her foot
against its thorns in trying to shield Adonis from Ares, for the second;
and so on. In every respect, Aphthonius has studied clearness, and he
has certainly achieved it. If it were not for the dangers of the whole
method, and especially that greatest one, of encouraging the mistake of
classification for fact, terms for things, orderly reference to a
schedule for æsthetic appreciation, he would deserve very hearty
applause. And even as it is, one could, as has been said above, see the
study which he facilitates substituted for any one of at least a dozen
subjects of our modern overcrowded curriculum with a great deal of
equanimity. Short as the piece is, some of the examples, such as the
encomia of Thucydides and of Wisdom, are compositions of considerable
finish. But it is significant that in the first there is, strictly
speaking, no literary criticism at all, and that even the inevitable
comparison with Herodotus is poorly shuffled off with the stock reproach
that Herodotus writes to please, Thucydides to speak the truth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account