A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
With English the patient was very much more predisposed to the disease.
[Sidenote: _Special wants of English Prosody._] Not only two, but
practically three, different systems of prosody, which were really to
some extent opposed to each other, and might well seem more opposed than
they actually were, disputed, in practice, the not too fertile or
flourishing field of English poetry. There was the true Chaucerian
system of blended English prosody, the legitimate representative of the
same composite influences which have moulded English language, and which
had been slowly developed through the half-chaotic beginnings of Middle
English verse, and then with almost premature suddenness perfected up to
a certain stage by Chaucer himself. [Sidenote: _Its kinds:_
(1)_Chaucerian._] This system combined—though not yet in perfect
freedom—the strict syllabic foot-division of the French with the
syllabic licence of Anglo-Saxon, so as to produce a system of syllabic
equivalence similar in nature to, if not yet fully in practice freer
than, that of the Greek Iambic trimeter. It admitted a considerable
variety of metres, the base-integers of which were the octosyllable and
decasyllable, with lines of six, twelve, and others occasionally,
combined in pairs or arranged in stanzas of more or less intricate
forms. But—by a historic accident which has even yet to be rather taken
as found than fully explained—nobody for more than a hundred years had
been able to produce really good regular[220] poetry in Southern English
by this metre, and certain changes in pronunciation and
vocabulary—especially the disuse of the final vocalised _e_—were putting
greater and greater difficulties in the way of its practice.
-----
Footnote 220:
There had, of course, been some charming jets of folk-song in ballad,
carol, and what not.
-----
Secondly, there was the revived alliterative metre, either genuine—that
is to say, only roughly syllabic and not rhymed, but rhythmed nearer to
the anapæstic form than to any other—or allied with rhyme, and sometimes
formed into stanzas of very considerable intricacy. [Sidenote: _(2)
Alliterative._] This, which had arisen during the fourteenth century, no
one quite knows how or where, apparently in the North, and which had
maintained a vigorous though rather artificial life during the
fifteenth, had not wholly died out, being represented partly by the
ballad metre, by doggerel twelves, fourteeners, and other long shambling
lines, and by a still lively tendency towards alliteration itself, both
in metred verse and in prose. Latterly, during Ascham’s own youth, a
sort of _rapprochement_ between these two had made the fourteeners and
Alexandrines, rather less doggerelised, very general favourites; but had
only managed to communicate to them a sort of lolloping amble, very
grievous and sickening to the delicate ear.
[Sidenote: (3) _Italianated._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account