A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Thirdly, and in close connection with this combination, Wyatt, Surrey,
and other poets had, by imitating Italian models, especially in the
sonnet, striven to raise, to bind together, to infuse with energy and
stiffen with backbone, the ungainly shambling body of English verse: and
Surrey, again following the Italians, had tried, with some success, the
unrhymed decasyllable soon to be so famous as blank verse.
Now critical observation at the time might survey this field with view
as extensive and intensive as it could apply, and be far from satisfied
with the crops produced. [Sidenote: _Deficiencies of all three._] To
represent the first system there was nobody but Chaucer, who, great and
greatly admired as he was, was separated from the men of 1550 by a
period of time almost as long as that which separates us from Pope, and
by a much greater gulf of pronunciation and accent. Nobody could write
like Chaucer—unless the Chaucerian _Chorizontes_ are right in
attributing _The Court of Love_ to this time, in which case there was
some one who could write very much like Chaucer indeed. There was no
Langland, and nobody who could write in the least like Langland. In
sheer despair, men of talent like Skelton, when they were not
Chaucerising heavily, were indulging (of course with more dulcet
intervals now and then) in mere wild gambades of doggerel.
But it will be said, Was there not the new Italianated style of poets of
such promise as Wyatt and Surrey? There was. Yet it must be remembered
that Wyatt and Surrey themselves are, after all, poets of more promise
than performance; that their promise itself looks much more promising to
us, seeing as we do its fulfilment in Spenser and onward, than it need
have done, or indeed could do, to contemporaries; that stalwart
Protestants and stout Englishmen feared and loathed the Italianation of
anything English; and lastly, that even the prosody of Wyatt and Surrey
is, in a very high degree, experimental, tentative, incomplete. We
laugh, or are disgusted, at the twists and tortures applied by the
hexametrists to our poor mother tongue; but Wyatt at least puts almost
as awkward constraints on her.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account