A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
On the higher and more abstract questions of poetry (which are by no
means to be neglected) Aristotle is the guide; but the meaning of
Aristotle is not always self-evident even so far as it goes, and it
sometimes requires supplementing. Poetry is the imitation of nature:
but this imitation may be carried on either by copying nature as it is
or by inventing things which do not actually exist, and have never
actually existed, but which conduct themselves according to the laws
of nature and reason. The poet is _not_ a public nuisance, but quite
the contrary. He must, however, both delight _and_ instruct.
As for the Kinds of poetry, they are not mere working classifications
of the practice of poets, but have technically constituting
definitions from which they might be independently developed, and
according to which they ought to be composed. The general laws of
Tragedy are given by Aristotle; but it is necessary to extend his
prescription of Unity so as to enjoin three species—of Action, Time,
and Place. Tragedy must be written in verse, which, though not exactly
the constituting form of poetry generally, is almost or quite
inseparable from it. The illegitimacy of prose in Comedy is less
positive. Certain extensions of the rules of the older Epic may be
admitted, so as to constitute a new Epic or Heroic Poem; but it is
questionable whether this may have the full liberty of Romance, and it
is subject to Unity, though not to the dramatic Unity. Other Kinds are
inferior to these.
In practising them, and in practising all, the poet is to look first,
midmost, and last to the practice of the ancients. “The ancients” may
even occasionally be contracted to little more than Virgil; they may
be extended to take in Homer, or may be construed much more widely.
But taking things on the whole, “the ancients” have anticipated almost
everything, and in everything that they have anticipated have done so
well that the best chance of success is simply to imitate them. The
detailed precepts of Horace are never to be neglected; if
supplemented, they must be supplemented in the same sense.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account