A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxySaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 2 (of 3), From the Renaissance to the decline of eighteenth century orthodoxy
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Politian’s critical faculty shows to more advantage here than in his
attribution of the Epistles of the Pseudo-Phalaris to Lucian (see
Bentley’s immortal _Dissertation_). He had almost better—from the
literary point of view—have believed them genuine.
-----
Neither purpose nor method can be regarded as wholly favourable to
criticism. The popular _conférencier_ (for this term best expresses
Politian’s position) is sure to be rather more of a panegyrist or a
detractor, as the case may be, than of a critic; and the lecturer in
verse is sure to be thinking rather of showing his own rhetorical and
poetical gifts than of the strict merits and defects of his subject. But
if we take the _Nutricia_ or the _Rusticus_, the _Ambra_ or the _Manto_,
and compare any of them with the well-intentioned summary of the
_Labyrinthus_,[27] we shall see without the least unfairness, and fully
admitting the difference of ability and of opportunity in the two men,
the difference, from the critical point of view, of the two
stand-points.
-----
Footnote 27:
_V._ vol. i. p. 408.
-----
In the “Manto,” the first of the _Sylvæ_, the most important
characteristic of sixteenth-century Italian criticism proper, the
exaltation of Virgil, is already prominent. [Sidenote: _The_ Manto.]
Politian, indeed, was too much of a wit, and too much of a poet himself,
to let his Virgil-worship take the gross and prosaic form which it
assumed a little later in Vida. But he has proceeded a long way from the
comparatively uncritical (and yet so more critical) standpoint of Dante.
He comes to details. Cicero had won the palms of sweetness from Nestor
and of tempestuous eloquence from Ulysses (a little vague this), but
Greece consoled herself in poetry. Ennius was too rude to give Latium
the glory of that. Then came Virgil. Even with the Syracusan reed
(_i.e._, in his Eclogues) he crushes Hesiod and contends with Homer.
Calliope took him in her arms as an infant, and kissed him thrice.
Manto, the guardian nymph of his native place, hailed his advent, and
summarised in prophetic detail his achievements in verse. Her town shall
enter the lists—secure of victory—with the seven competitors for Homer’s
origin. And then a whirlwind of magniloquent peroration (charged with
epanaphora,[28] that favourite figure of the sixteenth century) extols
the poet above all poets and all wonders of the world, past, present,
and to come.
-----
Footnote 28:
_Aut_ telo, Summane, tuo traxere ruinam,
_Aut_ trucibus nimbis aut iræ obnoxia Cauri,
_Aut_ tacitis lenti perierunt dentibus ævi.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account