A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
But it should not be allowed to stand. Fontanes shows us, in a manner
made more historically important by the fact that for a long time he was
a sort of Minister of Literature to Napoleon, that turning, that
transition, which is the subject of this whole chapter. He still, and
naturally, has a great deal of the eighteenth century in him; but he can
see the vacuity and the frigidity of eighteenth-century “emphasis.” He
is responsible[224] for teaching Victor Hugo that Voltaire taught _us_
to admire Shakespeare, one of the most remarkable mare’s-nests in
critical history. But, his eyes perhaps sharpened a little by personal
friendship, he perceived to a very large extent, if not fully, the
importance of the _Génie du Christianisme_. So there may have been mixed
motives in his different reception of Madame de Staël’s theories; but
there is a singular and satisfactory compound of eighteenth-century good
sense and nineteenth-century catholicity in his dealing with her
fantasticalities about North and South. He is himself rather rhetorical
at times, but seldom to the loss of sobriety; and he is altogether a
good sample, a good tell-tale, of the attitude of the inhabitants of a
landslip—as we may call it—who see their old marks changing relation and
bearing, who do not wholly like it, but who are capable of adapting
themselves, at any rate to some extent, to the change.
[Sidenote: _Geoffroy._]
Another interesting and representative person is Geoffroy,[225] who
incurred the strictures of Joubert, and has had them “passed on” by Mr
Arnold. Geoffroy—the pillar for many years of the _Année Littéraire_ and
of the _Débats_, the “Folliculus” of Luce de Lancival—has received from
Gosse (M. Etienne, not Mr Edmund) the praise of having “toujours marché
dans la même route et à la lueur du flambeau qu’il avait choisi dès le
commencement.” In other words _immutatus et immutabilis_—an attribution
magnificent in some relations of life; not, perhaps, as we have before
noted, in criticism. Geoffroy’s road and torch might have been better
chosen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account