A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
For those who like _Vitae Parallelae_, with a spice, or more than a
spice, of contrast, Nodier[255] makes an excellent pendant to Beyle: and
while his influence was much more rapid, it was wider also, if not
deeper. Nodier began his romantic and “xenomaniac” excursions with the
century, writing on Shakespeare in 1801 and on Goethe in 1802. I have
chased in the catalogues, but without bagging, a collection of early
reviews of his, published by Barginet of Grenoble in 1822, which ought
to be of very considerable interest for our purpose. It is well known
how, especially after his appointment to the librarianship of the
Arsenal in 1823, his abode became a rallying-place, and he himself a
sort of Nestor-Ulysses of Romanticism, while his delightful fantastic,
or half-fantastic stories (the best of them to my thinking is _Inès de
las Sierras_), which are Sterne _plus_ Hoffmann _plus_ something else,
form no small part of the choicest outcome of the movement. But in
criticism proper, Nodier, though a great propelling and inspiring force,
has left rather inadequate recorded examples of this force in
application. This is partly due to the fact that his intense interest in
pure bibliography, and in the “curiosities of literature,” drew him, as
similar interests have often drawn others, a little away from that
severer altar on which burns the fire of pure literary and critical
appreciation. His principal book of this kind, perhaps his principal
non-creative work, _Mélanges tirés d’une Petite Bibliothèque_,[256]
shows this very clearly: and it may rather be feared that Nodier would
have preferred a perfectly worthless book, of which he possessed an
unique copy, or an extremely eccentric one, of which hardly anybody had
ever heard, to the greatest work which everybody knew and had on their
shelves. But still he did like much of the best of what was known, and,
fortunately, directed his liking most to that of the best which was not
so well known as it ought to be. And so there are few more
characteristic names—and few names of more power—than his in the French
Transition.
CHAPTER V.
ÆSTHETICS AND THEIR INFLUENCE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account