A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
burlesque itself despised and set aside.”[289] Perhaps there is not a
more unhappily selected single epithet in the whole range of criticism
than “the _cold_ Lucretius.”[290]
On the other hand, both in the more speciously literary parts of his
desultory discourses _de quodam Ashleio_, and outside of them, he has
frequent remarks on the Kinds;[291] he is quite copious on
Correctness;[292] and there can be no doubt that he deserves his place
in this chapter by the fashion in which he endeavours to utilise his
favourite _pulchrum_ and _honestum_ in reference to Criticism, of which
he is a declared and (as far as his inveterate affectation and mannerism
will let him) an ingenious defender. The main _locus_ for this is the
Third Miscellany, and its central, or rather culminating, passage[293]
occurs in the second chapter thereof. The Beautiful is the principle of
Literature as well as of Virtue; the sense whereby it is apprehended is
Good Taste; the manner of attaining this taste is by a gradual rejection
of the excessive, the extravagant, the vulgar.[294] A vague enough
gospel, and not over well justified by the fruits of actual appreciation
quoted above;[295] but not perhaps much vaguer, or possessing less
justification, than most metacritic.
[Sidenote: _Hume._]
The position of Hume in regard to literary criticism has an interest
which would be almost peculiar if it were not for something of a
parallel in Voltaire. If the literary opinions of the author of the
_Enquiry into Human Nature_ stood alone they would be almost negligible;
and if he had worked them into an elaborate treatise, like that of his
clansman Kames, this would probably, if remembered at all, be remembered
as a kind of “awful example.” In their context and from their author,
however, we cannot quite “regard and pass” Hume’s critical observations
as their intrinsic merit may seem to suggest that we should do: nay, in
that context and from that author, they constitute a really valuable
document in more than one relation.
[Sidenote: _Examples of his critical opinions._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account