A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
The _Portraits Littéraires_, with its satellite or tow-boat the
_Portraits de Femmes_, appears to have been a sort of favourite with
Sainte-Beuve. He rearranged it early from the original _Critiques et
Portraits Littéraires_;[574] he sifted out the _Portraits de Femmes_, as
if to concentrate special attention on them; he added from time to time
appetising and really important bonuses and _primes_ of appendices,
_Pensées_, personal confidences, and the like. A good deal of his
best-known work is in the four volumes (including the _Femmes_) as they
are now[575] current: and probably the collection meets the taste, of
the general reader at least, as well as any other of his numerous
collections, if not better. This, I venture to think,—using a phrase of
an author who would probably not have agreed with me in this particular
instance,—is because the general reader “does not want criticism,” or
does not want it first of all. Sainte-Beuve, who knew everything, and
cared not to conceal it, knew, as the general reader does not know, that
the _causerie_, whether in volume- or essay-form, of mingled biography
and criticism, was of English, not French invention: and he confesses
that he longed to imitate it. He did so, and carried it even beyond
Johnson: but he was frequently tempted to let the biography and the
personality rather swamp the criticism, and I think he has done so here.
In the _Portraits de Femmes_ especially, be it gallantry, gossip-loving,
or God knows what, though there may be much interest, there is
uncommonly little criticism, even on La Rochefoucauld, who presents
himself in the middle of the galaxy with a singular and sultanesque
intrusion. On some of the subjects, such as Mme. de Longueville, there
could be none: even on Mme. de Sévigné and Mme. de Staël, where the
opportunities were infinite, there is little; and where there is most,
as in the case of Pauline de Meulan (Mme. Guizot), it is where we care
least about it. Of history and life plenty, and therefore of amusement
much; of criticism very little.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account