A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
Of the rest of the group mentioned above, Shenstone[112] is the
earliest, the most isolated, and the least directly affected by the
mediæval influence. Yet he, too, must have felt it to have engaged, as
we know he did, with Percy in that enterprise of the _Reliques_ which
his early death cut him off from sharing fully. From his pretty
generally known poems no one need have inferred much tendency of the
kind in him: for his Spenserian imitation, _The Schoolmistress_, has as
much of burlesque as of discipleship in it. Nor are indications of the
kind extremely plentiful in his prose works. But the remarkable _Essays
on Men and Manners_, which give a much higher notion of Shenstone’s
power than his excursions into the rococo, whether versified or
hortulary, are full of the new germs. Even here, however, he is, after
the prevailing manner of his century, much more ethical than literary,
and shows deference, if not reverence, to not a few of its literary
idols. The mixed character of his remarks on Pope[113] (which are,
however, on the whole very just) may be set down by the Devil’s Advocate
to the kind of jealousy commonly entertained by the “younger generations
who are knocking at the door”; and his objection to the plan of Spenser
is neo-classically purblind. But his remarks on Prosody[114] breathe a
new spirit, which, a little later, we shall be able to trace in
development. His preference for rhymes that are “long” in pronunciation
over snip-snaps like “cat” and “not”; his discovery—herald of the great
Coleridgean reaction—that “there is a vast beauty in emphasising in the
eighth and ninth place a word that is virtually a dactyl”; the way in
which he lays stress on harmony of period and music of style as sources
of literary pleasure; and above all the fact, that when examining the
“dactylic” idea just given, he urges the absurdity of barring
trisyllabic feet in _any_ place, and declares that a person ignorant of
Latin can discern Virgil’s harmony, show us the new principles at work.
Perhaps his acutest critical passage is the maxim, “Every good poet
includes a critic: the reverse will not hold”; his most Romantic, “The
words ‘no more’ have a singular pathos, reminding us at once of past
pleasure and the future exclusion of it.”[115]
[Sidenote: _Percy._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account