But it is not only ideas that have changed within the last two
decades; methods of study have undergone an even greater revolution.
De Vries, at almost the same time he discovered mutation,
rediscovered the fact that heredity was by no means so mysterious
and erratic as it had been generally thought. Animals and plants, he
discovered, possessed many characters which behaved in very definite
ways when two varieties were crossed, and that the characters of an
organism could be determined largely by the interbreeding of its
ancestors. Thus arose the science of _genetics_, which seeks to
find out the numerous factors underlying the various phenomena of
heredity. And since heredity is the base of all evolution, genetics
has for its ultimate aim the determination of the causes of that
great process which is responsible for the existence of whatever
animals and plants inhabit and have inhabited the earth. The
geneticist is the most modern of evolutionists; he is not satisfied
with finding out what has taken place in the past; he sets out to
make evolution, or tiny portions of it, take place within his own
laboratories and greenhouses.
* * * * *
Today, despite the assertions of a few of its opponents, the theory
of organic evolution is more thoroughly alive than it has ever
been before. Paleontologists are studying their fossil shells and
corals and bones in order to find out what has taken place during
the millions upon millions of years during which living things
have inhabited our planet. Anatomists are studying the bodies of
modern animals, from the simplest to the highest, to determine their
relationships one to the other; embryologists are tracing out the
evolution of the individual in his life before birth. The geneticists
are breeding plants, rabbits, mice, fishes, flies, potato bugs so
that they may discover what evolution is doing today. Everywhere
men are studying, comparing, experimenting. Their purpose is not
to discover whether or not evolution is a fact; on that point they
have long ago been satisfied. They are trying to find out how it
operates and what forms it has produced; how differences arise among
organisms, and what are their effects, and by what means they are
passed from one generation to another until they become part and
parcel of the inheritance, thereby establishing a new species.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Modified after Zeller and Osborn.
[2] Osborn, “From the Greeks to Darwin,” p. 86.
[3] This claim has at various times been disputed;
Osborn, however, accepts it without question.
[4] “From the Greeks to Darwin,” pp. 101-102.
[5] Quoted by Osborn, with the comment: “As Haeckel
observes, Darwin rose up as Kant’s Newton.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account