[15] Darwin seemed unable to speak of Lamarck without
contempt or derision. Certainly he was not familiar
with Lamarck’s writings in the French, and
attributed to that naturalist certain erroneous
ideas for which he was not responsible. Also, it
would seem that Darwin failed to make allowances for
Lamarck’s insuperable handicaps, and his position
as a pioneer, and therefore adopted an attitude of
unjustified antagonism.
[16] “Darwinism,” or “The Darwinian Theory” refers to the
theory of natural selection, and the sub-theory of
sexual selection, ~not~ to the theory or concept of
organic evolution.
[17] This conclusion was probably unjustified; his
observation covered too short a period to mean a
great deal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account