Euhemerus wrote a “Sacred Chronicle” (ἱερὰ ἀναγραφή)[1053] of an ideal society on an island near India, ruled by a priestly aristocracy. Here, labor was held in high regard. The artisans were in the priestly class, the farmers were second, and the herdsmen were on an equality with the soldiers.[1054] All land and other means of production were common, except the house and garden (κήπου).[1055] The land was not worked collectively, but farmers and herdsmen alike brought their products to a common storehouse for common consumption.[1056] Thus neither money nor commercial class was necessary. Jambulus, in his “Sun State,”[1057] outdoes even Euhemerus in his communistic ideas. He describes a sort of paradise of sun-worshipers at the equator. Here the trees never fail of ripe fruit, and the citizens never lose their strength and beauty. The whole social and economic life is under communistic régime. There is collective ownership of all the means of production, and each must take his turn at each kind of work.[1058] The communism extends also to the family.[1059] Thus Greek economic and social speculation, which always contained socialistic elements, ends in a communism for the whole citizenship, so thorough as to include both products and means of production, and to demand a leveling even of the natural inequalities that result from the different kinds of work. Footnote 853: Third century B.C.; cf. Zeller, _op. cit._, II, 1, 986 ff. Footnote 854: Cic. _De fin._, iv. 18. 49; Plut. _Adv. Stoicos_, p. 1065: οἱ τοῦ Ξενοκράτους καὶ Σπευσίππου κατηγοροῦντες ἐτὶ τῷ μὴ τὴν ὑγείαν ἀδιάφοραν ἡγεῖσθαι μηδὲ τὸν πλοῦτον ἀνωφελές. On Crantor, cf. _Ap. Sext. Emp._ (Bekker, p. 538, ll. 4 ff.); on the above, cf. Heidel, _Pseudo-Platonica_ (dissertation, Chicago, 1896), p. 60, n. 5; cf. also _Def._ 140, of Speusippus (Mullach, _op. cit._, III, 80): πλοῦτος κτῆσις σύμμετρος πρὸς εὐδαιμονίαν. Footnote 855: For discussion of all the _Economica_, cf. _infra_. Footnote 856: Born _ca._ 370 B.C. (Zeller, _op. cit._, II, 2, 807, n. 1), a voluminous writer, from whom a substantial amount is extant, notably his _Characters_. Footnote 857: περὶ πλούτου (_Aspas. in Eth._ 451; and Cic. _De officiis_ ii. 16. 56). Footnote 858: Cf. Zeller, _op. cit._, II, 2, 856. Footnote 859: Stob. _Flor._ iv. 283, No. 202, ed. Mein.: ὁ αὐτὸς (Theophrastus) ἔλεγεν ὀφείλομεν ἑαυτοὺς ἐθίζειν ἀπὸ ὀλίγων ζῆν, etc. Footnote 860: _Theophrasti Opera_, ed. Wimmer, iii. 231. fr. 86 f.; Plut. _Lycurg._ 10. Footnote 861: Theoph. _Op._ iii. 182. fr. 78: οὐδὲν πλέον ἔχουσιν οἱ πλούσιοι τῶν μέτρια κεκτημένων, etc. (Plut. _Cupid. Divit._ 527). Footnote 862: Cic. _De officiis_ ii. 16. 56. Footnote 863: Porph. _De abstin._ iii. 25. Footnote 864: Cf. above on Xenophon. Footnote 865: Cf. _infra_ on Cynics; Diog. L. vi. 1. 16; not extant. Footnote 866: Diog. L. iv. 12; not extant. Footnote 867: