A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
The horses (_†Orohippus_) were very small and primitive creatures, no
bigger than a fox, with four toes in the front foot and three in the
hind. So completely different in appearance and proportions were these
little animals from any of the modern horses, that it requires an effort
of the imagination to think of them as belonging to the same family, and
it is only by employing the family to designate a _genetic series_ that
such a classification can be justified. The †hyracodonts, or cursorial
rhinoceroses, were very abundantly represented by a number of small and
medium-sized animals (_†Hyrachyus_) which had less specialized teeth,
shorter neck and limbs than their upper Eocene and Oligocene successors,
and four toes in the front foot; one genus (_†Colonoceras_) had a
pair of nasal horns, but would seem to have died out without leaving
descendants. In the upper part of the beds is found the Uinta genus
_†Triplopus_, with three-toed fore foot; and in the same division occurs
another Uinta genus, _†Amynodon_, the most ancient known species of the
supposedly aquatic rhinoceroses. True rhinoceroses, that is animals which
were directly ancestral to the modern members of the family, have not
been identified and may not have been present in North America; that is
still an open question. Tapirs, all of them quite small, were relatively
common, but are still very incompletely known. The earliest known members
of the clawed †chalicotheres were of Bridger date.
It is worth remarking that, except a single genus in the upper and later
portion of the stage (_†Triplopus_), all of the Bridger perissodactyls
had four toes in the front foot and three in the hind, while in the White
River beds above the lowest substage the number three in both fore and
hind feet was almost equally universal.
One of the most radical and striking differences between the Uinta and
Bridger faunas was the rarity of Artiodactyla in the latter, which is
in almost equally strong contrast with their abundance in the middle
Eocene of Europe. Most significant of these rare Bridger artiodactyls
were the little creatures (_†Homacodon_), hardly so large as a domestic
cat, which may fairly be regarded as a very early stage, if not the
actual beginning, of the great camel family, which was destined to
play so conspicuous a part in the life of America, North and South.
Small pig-like animals (_†Helohyus_) which were no doubt ancestral
to the peccaries, were fairly common and there were, in addition,
relatively large animals (_†Achænodon_) allied, but not ancestral, to the
†giant-pigs of the Oligocene; some of these were considerably larger than
a full-grown Wild Boar (_Sus scrofa_).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account