A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
of them having been found in any other continent.
While the backward and archaic orders, most of which have left no
descendants in the modern world, had thus a stately representation in
Bridger times, they were outnumbered in genera, species and individuals
by the progressive orders, which are still in more or less flourishing
existence. The Primates, whether lemurs or monkeys, were numerous,
and this, so far as is definitely known, was their last appearance in
extra-tropical North America. They may at any time be found in the
Uinta, but there is small probability that they will ever turn up in
the White River or later formations. The many rodents all belonged to
the †ischyromyids, an extinct family which, there is much reason to
believe, was ancestral to many families of the squirrel-like suborder of
Sciuromorpha. Most of them were species of a single genus (_†Paramys_)
and varied in size from a mouse to a beaver, or even larger.
The Perissodactyla may be said, in one sense, to have reached their
culmination in the Bridger; not that many of them, such as the horses
and rhinoceroses, did not advance far beyond their state of development
in the Eocene, but at no subsequent time did the order as a whole
possess such dominating importance. There were five or six families
of perissodactyls in the Bridger, and their remains are much the most
abundant fossils found there. Individually, the commonest perissodactyls
of the time were the †titanotheres, of which there were several genera
and many species, differing chiefly in size and proportions, though the
largest hardly exceeded a modern tapir in stature and was not dissimilar
in appearance. These Bridger †titanotheres were considerably smaller
than those of the Uinta and therefore very much more so than the White
River forms; it was not till the latter stage that the family lived up
to its name of “titanic beasts.” By far the commonest of the genera in
the middle and lower Bridger was _†Palæosyops_, which was hornless, while
in the upper part of the beds are found genera (_e.g._ _†Manteoceras_
and _†Dolichorhinus_) in which the horns were just beginning to appear.
Another extinct family, the †Lophiodontidæ, which was very abundant in
the European Eocene, formed a very subordinate element in this fauna and
included a number of small tapiroid genera (_e.g._ _†Helaletes_).
[Illustration: FIG. 140.—Some characteristic mammals of the Bridger
Eocene reduced to a uniform scale, with a pointer dog, in frame,
for comparison. 1. Primitive rhinoceros (_†Hyrachyus eximius_). 2.
†Tritemnodon agilis. 3. _†Patriofelis ferox_, and 4, _†Dromocyon
velox_, †creodonts. 5. Primitive rodent (_†Paramys delicatior_). 6.
_†Uintatherium alticeps._ 7. †Titanothere (_†Mesatirhinus superior_).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account