_†Hyrachyus_ may be described as a generalized, relatively undifferentiated perissodactyl, from which almost any other family of the order, except the horses and the †titanotheres, might have been derived. The incisors, present in undiminished number, were well developed and functional, but not large, and the canines were moderately enlarged, forming small tusks. The premolars were all smaller and less complex than the molars, which had a strong resemblance to those of the tapirs; in the lower jaw they were identical with the latter, but in the upper jaw there was more than a suggestion of likeness to the rhinoceroses. The skull was long, narrow and low, hornless, and with thin, slender nasals and straight, horizontal upper contour. The neck was short, the body very long and the limbs of medium length and weight; though relatively stouter than in _†Triplopus_ of the upper Bridger and Uinta beds, they cannot be called heavy. The feet were not especially elongate and rather slender; the manus had four toes and the pes three. [Illustration: FIG. 183.—Skull of _†Hyrachyus_. (After Osborn.)] A brief and short-lived branch of this stock existed in the Bridger stage, but was not, so far as is known, represented in any of the subsequent stages, and was made up of a single genus (_†Colonoceras_) which had a small pair of dermal horns upon the nasal bones. In other respects, it was like _†Hyrachyus_. It is surprising to find that the horned series should have so speedily died out, while the defenceless forms not only persisted, but actually became more defenceless through the reduction of the canine tusks. _À priori_, one would have expected the opposite result, but the key to the enigma is probably to be found in the more perfect adaptation of the surviving kinds to swift running. The second subdivision (†Amynodontinæ) of this family contains a series of animals which developed in a very divergent fashion and went to quite the opposite extreme from the cursorial †hyracodonts, resembling the latter (aside from the fundamental characteristics common to all rhinoceroses, in the broadest sense of that term) only in the pattern of the molar teeth and in the absence of horns. The terminal member of the †amynodont series was a White River genus (_†Metamynodon_) of which the remains have been found almost exclusively in the consolidated and cemented sands filling the old river-channels of the middle substage of the White River beds. This fact, together with certain structural features of the skull and skeleton, leads at once to the suggestion that these animals were chiefly aquatic in their habits and somewhat like hippopotamuses in mode of life. _†Metamynodon_ was quite a large animal, the heaviest and most massive creature of its time, after the disappearance of the giant †titanotheres, but was low and short-legged.