A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
Of the three rhinoceros groups, whatever rank be assigned them, family
or subfamily, much the most prolific in divergent forms was that of the
true rhinoceroses (Rhinocerotidæ) of which seven or more phyla have been
distinguished, three of them surviving to the present time. Only in this
series were horns frequently present, the brief experiment, as it might
be called, of the Bridger genus _†Colonoceras_, being the only known
instances of horns among the †hyracodonts, and the †amynodonts were all
hornless. In making the comparison as to degree of ramification among
the three series, it should be borne in mind that the true rhinoceroses
were the only long-lived group, the other two dying out before or at
the end of the White River stage. Within the series or family of the
true rhinoceroses, there was no great divergence of type, and all the
members were much alike, heavy and slow animals, but with very great
variety in the details of structure. Take, for instance, the matter of
horns; we find both hornless and horned genera, the former preceding the
latter in time, but, so far as North America is concerned, continuing in
association with them till the end. Among the horned genera, the horn may
be single, double in a transverse pair (_†Diceratherium_) or arranged
one behind the other in the median line of the head (_Dicerorhinus_,
_Opsiceros_, etc.). The single horn may be on the nose or the forehead;
if on the nose, it may be on the upper side of the nasal bones
(_Rhinoceros_) or on the extreme tip and pointing obliquely forward
(_†Teleoceras_). The single frontal horn was much less common, but in the
extraordinary _†Elasmotherium_, of the European and Siberian Pleistocene,
the horn was of gigantic size and the surface for its attachment an
enormous, dome-like boss on the forehead.
All three of the series had their most ancient known representatives
in North America, and it seems probable, though by no means certain,
that they all originated here by divergence from a common stock, which
was represented more or less closely by the genus _†Hyrachyus_ of the
Bridger and Wind River stages of the Eocene. However that may be, true
rhinoceroses flourished exceedingly in the Old World from the upper
Oligocene to the Pleistocene, the events of the latter epoch restricting
them to their present range. The significance of the American genera for
the ancestry of the modern types can be found only in the most ancient
forms, _†Trigonias_ and _†Cænopus_; the subsequent development which
led up to the existing species of Asia and Africa went on entirely
in the eastern hemisphere. The †hyracodont subfamily had no known
representatives outside of North America, but the †amynodonts sent out
emigrants, which appeared for a brief time in the Oligocene of Europe.
In the varied history of the rhinoceroses, the principles of evolutionary
change which may be deduced from the recorded development of the horses,
tapirs and †titanotheres are found to be applicable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account