A history of land mammals in the western hemisphereScott, William Berryman
History
A history of land mammals in the western hemisphere
Scott, William Berryman
Mammals; Mammals, Fossil
The skull carried three pairs of bony protuberances, or horn-like
outgrowths; one pair on the nasal bones suggest by their shape and
character that they formed the support of dermal horns like those of
the paired-horn rhinoceroses (_†Diceratherium_) of the Oligocene and
lower Miocene. (See p. 239.) The second pair, which were moderately
high and thick prominences, almost cylindrical in shape and tapering
but slightly to their bluntly rounded ends, were chiefly outgrowths of
the maxillaries, or upper jaw-bones. From their shape, it is likely
that these were not sheathed in horn, but were merely covered with
skin, as were also the third pair, which arose from the parietals.
These were massive, club-shaped prominences, eight or ten inches high
and broadening to the free ends, a shape which makes it impossible to
suppose that these were true horn-cores covered with horny sheaths. A
high crest of bone, representing the occipital crest, enclosed the top
and back of the cranium, connecting the posterior pair of “horns” and
dying away in front of them. The top of the cranium had thus a deep,
basin-like character, such as is to be found in no mammal outside of this
suborder and was one of the most peculiar features of this extraordinary
skull. The brain-cavity was absurdly small, the growth of the brain not
having kept pace with that of the body; the cavity is hidden away in
the postero-inferior portion of the skull, the immense thickness of the
cranial walls being somewhat lightened by the formation of sinuses, but
these were much less extensive and pervasive than in other very large,
horned or tusk-bearing mammals, such as elephants, rhinoceroses, etc.
Probably, as in the case of the †titanotheres and †entelodonts, this
deficiency of brain-development was at least one of the factors which led
to the early extinction of the group. The premaxillaries were slender
and rod-like bones, which did not meet in the middle line and carried no
teeth. The long and massive nasal bones and the position of the nasal
opening show that these animals cannot have had a proboscis of any kind.
The lower jaw was remarkable for the great bony flange which, in the
males, descended on each side from the lower border, near the anterior
end, and served to protect the great canine tusks from fracture.
[Illustration: FIG. 230.—Skull of †uintathere (_†Uintatherium alticeps_),
lower jaw supplied from another species. Princeton University Museum. For
restoration, see Fig. 231, p. 447.]
The female skull differed in two respects from that of the male: (1) the
horn-like protuberances were much more slender and less prominent; (2) as
the upper canine did not form a tusk, the lower jaw had no flanges. The
skull of the artiodactyl _†Protoceras_ (p. 406) was remarkably similar to
that of the †uintatheres.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account