In the same manuscript with the _Sompniale dilucidarium Pharaonis_ and the work of William of Aragon on dreams just described is another long anonymous work on the interpretation of dreams.[959] It makes the usual points that the meaning of dreams varies with times and persons. But the treatise consists chiefly[960] of a mass of significations which are not even arranged in alphabetical order, a failing which it is attempted to remedy by an alphabetical index at the close.[961] FOOTNOTES: [911] Cockayne, _Anglo-Saxon Leechdoms_, RS vol. 35, 1864-1866, III. x. The Ὀνειροκριτικά was printed by the Aldine press at Venice, 1518; a Latin translation by Cornarius appeared at Basel, 1539; it was published in both Latin and Greek by N. Rigaltius at Paris, 1603; the modern edition is by R. Hercher, Leipzig, 1864. I have not seen P. Diepgen, _Traum und Traumdeutung als medizinisch-naturwissenschaftliches Problem im Mittelalter_, Berlin, 1912. [912] Its full title reads: _Artemidori Daldiani et Achmetis Sereimi F. (filius) Oneirocritica. Astranpsychi et Nicephori versus etiam Oneirocritici. Nicolai Rigaltii ad Artemidorum Notae_. Paris. 1603. [913] They cover only twenty pages in large type as against the 269 pages of small type of _Artemidorus_. _Astrampsychos_ was also published at Amsterdam in 1689 with the _Oracula Sibyllina_ by S. Gallaeus. [914] Proem. 2. [915] Papyrus 122. [916] See note 1 on this page. The work was previously printed at Frankfort under the title _Apomasaris Apotelesmata_ or _Predictions of Albumasar_. There is some matter missing at the beginning of both of these editions of the work. [917] Rigaltius, however, states that Achmet’s name did not appear in either of the two Latin MSS at Paris which he used, nor in the Greek one; but the opening of his text, as just stated in the previous note, seems defective. On Ahmed ben Sirin see: Drexl, _Achmets Traumbuch_ (_Einleitung und Probe eines kritischen Textes_), Munich dissertation, 1909; and articles by Steinschneider in _Zeitschrift d. deutsch. Morgenl. Gesellschaft_, XVII, 227-44, _Vienna Sitzungsberichte_, _Phil-hist. Kl._ CLXIX, 53 and CLI, 2: cited by Haskins (1918), p. 494, note 12. [918] Krumbacher (1897), p. 630. [919] _Cat. Cod. Astrol. Graec._, II, 122, Achmet, _De introductione et fundamento astrologiae_. ἡ ποίησις τούτου τοῦ τοιούτου βιβλίου ἐκ τῶν βιβλίων τῶν Περσῶν ὃ ἐποίησεν ὁ Ἀχμάτης, ὅστις ὡς ἔφη συνῆξε τὰ βιβλία τὰ εὑρισκόμενα ἀπὸ τοῦ Ἀδὰμ μέχρι τῆς αὐτοῦ ἡμέρας. Since this astrological work mentions Albumasar, while Achmet, the author of the dream-book, wrote early in the ninth century, the editors of the _Catalogus_ doubt if the two Achmets are the same, but it should be noted that in the astrological treatise Achmet is spoken of in the third person and that it may be a re-editing of his original work. On the other hand, perhaps this astrological Achmet is Alphraganus, or Ahmetus filius Ahmeti (Ameti), as he is often called.