A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
[433] See the enumeration of polygynous peoples in
WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, 431-35; SPENCER, _op.
cit._, I, 682, 683; WAKE, _Marriage and Kinship_, 181
ff.; MASON, _Woman's Place in Primitive Culture_, 222 ff.
[434] HELLWALD, _Die mensch. Familie_, 366 ff.;
GROSSE, _Die Formen der Familie_, 104 ff.
[435] See the lists of monogamous peoples in
WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, 435-38; and compare
DARWIN, _Descent of Man_, 591; POST,
_Familienrecht_, 73; LETOURNEAU, _L'évolution du
mariage_, chap. xi; and especially GROSSE, _Die Formen
der Familie_, as above summarized, chap. ii.
[436] SARASIN, _Die Weddas von Ceylon_, I, 457-75. These
investigators, sustaining Westermarck's view of social evolution,
regard the monogamy of the Veddahs as a typical primitive
institution. Of course, as KOHLER, _Zur Urgeschichte
der Ehe_, 10 ff., 14 ff., urges against Westermarck and the
Sarasin brothers, the accumulation of a great number of examples
of peoples among whom monogamy prevails does not necessarily
constitute proof of the original condition of man. It is
possible, for example, that the Veddahs are far advanced beyond
their former condition, or, conversely, that they are a degraded
race. Still the existence of these examples of the single pairing
family among barbarous and savage men, as well as those found
among the anthropoid mammals, puts the burden of proof on the
other side. At any rate, it must not be lightly assumed that this
kind of evidence has been used more critically by the adherents
of the theory of promiscuity than by those who take the opposite
view.
Where polygyny exists it is sometimes the chiefs alone who are
"permitted to have a plurality of wives." Besides, just as in the
case of polyandry, "almost everywhere it is confined to a very small
part of the people, the majority being monogamous." It is so "among
all Mohammedan peoples, in Asia and Europe, as well as in Africa."
Ninety-five per cent. of the Mohammedans of India, for instance, are
said to be monogamists; and in Persia, it is reported, only "two per
cent. of the population enjoy the questionable luxury of a plurality
of wives." Among the American aborigines monogamy is the rule.
Although polygyny widely exists among them, seldom are more than
two wives found.[437] Indeed the numerical proportion of the sexes
throughout the world renders it impossible for polygyny to become
the general practice.[438]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account