A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
[637] It is so regarded by SOHM, _Institutes of Roman
Law_, 361 n. 3; by WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, 397;
SCHRADER, _op. cit._, 382. ROSSBACH, _Die
römische Ehe_, 65 ff., 93, 145, 245 ff., holds that there was one
original form from which both _coemptio_ and _confarreatio_ were
derived, and that it combined purchase with religious elements.
KARLOWA, _Die Formen der röm. Ehe_, 1 ff., 45.,
criticises Rossbach and holds that it remains to be proved that
_coemptio_ is a survival of real purchase, it being more likely
a particular use of _mancipatio_ arising perhaps under Servius
Tullius; but LEIST, _op. cit._, 128 ff., rejects this
view and favors the theory of survival. LANGE, _Römische
Alterthümer_, I, 105, 106; and BERNHÖFT, _Römische
Königszeit_, 186, are in practical agreement with Karlowa. _Cf._
POSTE, _Gaius_, 89 ff.; MUIRHEAD, _Private
Law of Rome_, 441-43, who rejects the theory of survival;
LETOURNEAU, _L'évolution du mariage_, 149, 150;
MONLEZUN, _Femme mariée_, 28-30.
[638] See LUBBOCK, _Origin of Civilization_, 74, who
compares _usus_ and _coemptio_. _Cf._ POSTE, _Gaius_, I,
§ 111, p. 88; LETOURNEAU, _op. cit._, 150.
Herodotus mentions wife-purchase as a Thracian custom;[639] and
until very recently it was also practiced by the Slavs.[640] The
bazar of Babylon,[641] where, according to Herodotus, girls were
publicly sold in marriage, found its counterpart not long since
in the maiden-market of the Roumanian Gainaberg.[642] The ancient
laws of Ireland reveal it in curious relation to wife-capture. The
legitimate wife is the wife who is bought. At the first marriage
the full _coibche_, or bride-price, is paid to the father; at
the second, the bride receives one-third; and at each succeeding
marriage a gradually increasing portion falls to her share.[643]
Marriage by abduction is illegal. In that case children begotten
during the first month belong to the wife's family, though they
may be conveyed to their father for a composition; and to such
conveyance he is legally entitled, when the abduction takes place
with the woman's consent. After the first month the relation
between husband and wife is partially legalized. The children
begotten thereafter belong to their father, though they are really
illegitimate and hence not entitled to full rights of inheritance.
Furthermore, a gift from the wife to the husband is void. But every
defect in the marriage is at once cured by payment and acceptance of
the _coibche_. In case the price cannot be arranged the family of
the wife are entitled to damage. They may demand that another woman
be placed at their disposal for an equal term; or they may exact a
partnership share in the earnings of the abductor.[644]
[639] HERODOTUS, v, 6: RAWLINSON, III, 180.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account