A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
[139] The monograph of DR. KARL SCHMIDT, _Jus primae
noctis_, is the most elaborate work on the subject. The author
denies (41 ff., 365 ff., 379) that the custom existed in
feudal Europe or elsewhere as a _right_; and he holds that
the practices so called are not evidences of promiscuity.
His views are sharply criticised by HELLWALD, _Die
mensch. Familie_, 349 n. 4; and especially by KOHLER,
in _ZVR._, IV, 279-87. SCHMIDT has a supplementary
discussion in _ZFE._, XVI, 44 ff.; and is reviewed unfavorably by
KOHLER, _ZVR._, V, 397-406. See also SCHMIDT'S
_Slavische Geschichtsquellen zur Streitfrage über das Jus
Primae Noctis_; KOHLER, _Urgeschichte der Ehe_, 140;
_idem_, in _ZVR._, VII, 350, 351; VIII, 85; SCHNEIDER,
_Die Naturvölker_, II, 471-73; GIRAUD-TEULON, _op.
cit._, 32-41; WEINHOLD, _Die deutschen Frauen_, I,
300, 301; LETOURNEAU, _L'évolution du mariage_,
56-62; SUGGENHEIM, _Geschichte der Aufhebung der
Leibeigenschaft_, 104, who believes the "right of the
lord" existed in France far down into the Middle Ages;
BACHOFEN, _Mutterrecht_, 12, 13, 17, 18, _passim_;
POST, _Anfänge_, 17, 18; _idem_, _Geschlechtsgenoss._,
37; KULISCHER, "Die communale Zeitehe," in _Archiv für
Anthropologie_, XI, 228 ff., who refers to the recent existence
of the alleged custom in Russia; FRIEDRICHS, in _ZVR._,
X, 214, 215; STARCKE, _op. cit._, 124-26. There is a
learned discussion in the quaint _De uxore theotisca_, cap. i,
of GRUPEN; the literature cited in Bibliographical
Note II should be consulted; and Schmidt has appended a very
full bibliography to his book. The term _jus primae noctis_ is
especially applied to the alleged "right of the lord" in feudal
times; but the existence of even this custom as a legal privilege
is still an unsettled question.
[140] The custom is for the men "to buy the women whom they
marry of their fathers and relatives at a high price, and then
to take them to a chief, who is considered to be a priest, to
deflower them and see if she is a virgin; and if she is not,
they have to return the whole price, and he can keep her for
his wife or not, or let her be consecrated, as he chooses."
In the same connection, Castañeda says, "among them are men
dressed like women who marry other men and serve as their wives;"
and he describes also a curious kind of legal or consecrated
prostitution existing among the same people: see the translation
of Castañeda's account in WINSHIP'S "Coronado
Expedition, 1540-2," _XIV. Rep. of Bureau of Eth._, 513, 514.
_Cf._ FAWCETT, "On Basivis: Women, Who, through
Dedication to a Deity, Assume Masculine Privileges," _Jour. Anth.
Soc._ (Bombay), II (1891), 322-54.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account