A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
Thus in New England the betrothal regained a sanction similar to
that which it possessed according to primitive Germanic custom.
It was, in fact, a kind of marriage. The espoused couple were
separated from the world and placed in a relation whose sacredness
might not be violated as respects others without the most serious
consequences. On the other hand, it was entirely in harmony with
this theory that when they "were guilty of incontinence with each
other after pre-contract before marriage, their punishment was in
general one half, or less than one half, what it would have been
had there been no betrothment."[554] By the statute of Plymouth,
for example, the penalty in such cases was fifty shillings for
each person and imprisonment for a period not exceeding three days,
or if the guilty persons "will not or cannot" pay the fine, they
are to suffer "corporal punishment by whipping" instead; while for
transgression before contract the fine was twice as much.[555] This
was, in effect, to place a premium[556] upon wrongdoing committed
between the espousals and the nuptials. Naturally the immorality of
such offenses seemed thus to be lessened; and, as will presently
appear, a vast amount of sexual license was the natural result.
[Footnote 554: SHIRLEY, _loc. cit._, 308.]
[Footnote 555: The whole of this curious law may prove
instructive. It is enacted "That any person or persons that shall
Comit Carnall Copulation before or without lawfull contract
shalbee punished by whiping or els pay ten pounds fine apeece
and bee Imprisoned during the pleasure of the Court soe it
bee not aboue three daies but if they bee or wilbee married
[_i. e._, a "delayed" marriage voluntarily solemnized or else
marriage prescribed as a penalty] the one to the other; then but
ten pounds both and Imprisoned as aforsaid; and by a lawfull
Contract the Court vnderstands the mutuall consent of parents or
guardians if there bee any to bee had; and a sollemne promise of
marriage in due time to each other before two competent witnesses
[this being the regulation of pre-contract already mentioned in
the text]; and if any person or persons shall Comitt carnall
Coppulation after contract and before Marriage they shall pay
each fifty shillings and bee both Imprisoned," etc.--_Plym. Col.
Rec._, XI, 172, 95, 46. Originally the punishment for fornication
was left in the discretion of the magistrates: _ibid._, 12.]
[Footnote 556: _Cf._ SHIRLEY, _loc. cit._, 308, 309.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account