A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 3 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 3 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
[405] _Cf._ Act of March 12: _Laws of Del._ (1873), 633-35; or
the same in _Rev. Stat._ (1874), 475; with _Rev. Stat._ (1893),
595.
The discretionary grounds are now (1) "procurement of the
marriage by fraud for want of age, the husband being under the
age of eighteen years or the wife being under the age of sixteen
years at the time of the marriage, and such marriage not being
after those ages voluntarily ratified;" (2) "wilful neglect on
the part of the husband for three years to provide for his wife
the necessaries of life suitable to her condition."
The history of judicial divorce in the West begins with the statute
adopted for the Northwest Territory in 1795. Jurisdiction is vested
in the general court and the circuit courts, which are empowered
to grant absolute divorce (1) for adultery; (2) impotency; (3)
where either person had a husband or wife alive at the time of the
second marriage; or to grant partial divorce for extreme cruelty in
either spouse.[406] This law was repealed in 1804 by an act of the
legislature of Ohio--that portion of the Northwest Territory having
been made a state in 1802--giving the supreme court sole cognizance
of divorce suits. By it no provision for partial divorce is made;
but full dissolution of marriage is sanctioned (1) for bigamy, as
in 1795; (2) for wilful absence for five years; (3) for adultery;
and (4) for extreme cruelty.[407] After eighteen years' trial, the
plan of 1804 was in its turn superseded. Six grounds of absolute
divorce were then provided. Of these four are identical with those
just mentioned, except that the term of wilful absence is reduced
to three years. In addition there are recognized (5) physical
incompetence at the time of the marriage; and (6) sentence with
actual imprisonment for violation of the criminal laws of the state,
provided application be made during the term of confinement.[408]
Two years later a new plan was adopted. Absolute divorce was
permitted for the six causes allowed in 1822; and partial divorce,
which had not existed by statute for twenty years, was revived; the
courts, on the same six grounds, being authorized, instead of full
dissolution of wedlock, to decree separation from bed and board, or
merely alimony, according to justice and the circumstances in each
case.[409] This provision, however, was short-lived; for in 1833
partial divorce was a second time abolished.[410]
[406] CHASE, _Stat._, I, 192, 193 (act of July 15, 1795).
[407] _Ibid._, 493, 494.
[408] Act of Jan. 11, 1822: CHASE, _Stat._, II, 1210, 1211.
[409] Act of Jan. 7, 1824: CHASE, _Stat._, II, 1408, 1409.
[410] Act of Feb. 22, 1833: CHASE, _Stat._, III, 1934.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account