A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 3 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 3 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
of daily toil potentially gives more leisure for building, adorning,
and enjoying the home.
[785] _Cf._ PEABODY, _Jesus Christ and the Social Question_,
162-79; MUIRHEAD, _Is the Family Declining?_ 35.
[786] In the great centers of Germany, we are assured, the
family of the blood-kindred has yielded to the family composed
of kindred and strangers. For lack of space in the closely
packed districts people are forced to live almost in common:
GÖHRE, _Drei Monate Fabrikarbeiter_, 12 ff., 37 ff. _Cf._
BEBEL, _Die Frau und der Sozialismus_, 123, 124; and RADE, _Die
sittlich-religiöse Gedankenwelt unserer Industriearbeiter_, 117
ff.; STEWART, _Disintegration of the Families of the Workingmen_;
HENDERSON, _Social Elements_, 73.
To the socialist the monogamic family in its present form is
decidedly a failure. "To those who would substitute common ownership
for industrial liberty, the institution of the family presents one
of the most persistent obstacles. Domestic unity is inconsistent
with the absolute social unity vested in the state."[787] The larger
social body must be composed of individual members, free and equal;
and it will not tolerate within itself a smaller body with special
group-interests of its own, much less with any vestige of coercive
authority over its constituent parts. There must be no _imperium
in imperio_. Writers like Engels[788] seek consolation and support
in Bachofen's theory of a universal stage of mother-right before
the monogamic family with the institution of private property had
brought domestic slavery into the world. They "hold that the
monogamic family is a relic of decaying civilization. All ideas
on which it rests, the subordination and dependence of women, the
ownership of children, the belief in the sacredness of marriage as a
divine institution, above all respect for the individual ownership
of property and the rights of inheritance as permanent elements in
our social organization--have been undermined. The foundations are
sapped and the superstructure is ready to topple in."[789]
[787] PEABODY, _op. cit._, 140.
[788] See ENGELS, _Der Ursprung der Familie_, 4 ff.; and his
follower, BEBEL, _Die Frau und der Sozialismus_, 1 ff., 93 ff.
[789] MUIRHEAD, _Is the Family Declining?_ 37.
Woman in particular has been the devoted victim of the greed of
individual possession upon which the monogamic family rests. "Far
back in history," according to Edward Carpenter, "at a time when in
the early societies the thought of inequality had hardly arisen, it
would appear that the female, in her own way--as sole authenticator
of birth and parentage, as guardian of the household, as inventress
of agriculture and the peaceful arts, as priestess and prophetess
or sharer in the councils of the tribe--was as powerful as man in
his, and sometimes even more so. But from thence down to today what
centuries of repression, of slavehood, of dumbness, of obscurity
have been her lot!"[790]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account