A History of Oregon, 1792-1849: Drawn From Personal Observation and Authentic InformationGray, W. H. (William Henry)
History
A History of Oregon, 1792-1849: Drawn From Personal Observation and Authentic Information
Gray, W. H. (William Henry)
Frontier and pioneer life -- Oregon; Oregon Territory -- History
"It had been the policy of the Hudson's Bay Company to destroy the
chieftainship, cut the different tribes into small clans, and divide
their interests as far as possible, so as to weaken them, and render
them incapable of injuring the whites, thus preventing them from
acting in concert." At the time this policy was adopted by the
company there were no whites in the country but themselves. Mr.
Hines believes that the American settlement was to be benefited by
this shrewd policy of the company, and attributes to Dr. White the
opposite policy. He says, page 143, that "the sub-agent adopted a
different policy."
How natural and how easy for his reverence to fall into this error, and
to say, on page 142, "Thomas McKay contributed much to allay the
excitement among them, and, in connection with the sub-agent, induced
the natives to adopt a code of laws and appoint a head chief, and
inferior chiefs, sufficient to carry the laws into execution." Not the
least suspicion of McKay's instructions and the Hudson's Bay Company's
arrangements and consent in the matter, and that the sub-agent was the
very man the company was making use of to get their own trained and
educated Indian (Ellis) at the head of the Nez Percé tribe, to
accomplish the object they had in view. Mr. Hines has given us a good
history, for which we thank him in behalf of truth, and also for the
assistance it has given us in showing to the world the damning policy,
the accursed influences brought to bear against the little band of
patriots that had the courage to contend against such fearful
combinations of avarice, stupidity, superstition, and savagism; and here
allow me to say, is the reason that Whitman, Harvey Clark, Shortess,
Smith, Cornelius Rogers, J. L. Meek, Couch, and fifty others, had no
confidence in White or his advisers and friends.
Le Breton acted well his part; the company knew him better than Mr.
Hines did; his death was a victory, as they supposed, to them, but the
effort moved on. The act of a few Indians, in going to St. Louis in
1832, for religious knowledge, brought Mr. Hines to the country with
others more capable of meeting the combined influences of avarice,
stupidity, bigotry, and superstition.
And although many things have combined to keep them from any pecuniary
reward, still facts, and the history of the country they have saved as
the golden gem of our great Republic, will seek to know who it was whose
efforts could successfully contend with such influences as were then
held by the company, the Jesuit priests, Dr. White, and the Methodist
Mission. We now know why our little settlement wept and mourned the
death of Rogers, Le Breton, and Whitman, as they were substantial
pillars in our temple of liberty on this coast. Does a simple slab mark
the place of their rest? Their surviving associates are not able to
answer in the affirmative.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account