A History of Story-telling: Studies in the development of narrativeRansome, Arthur
History
A History of Story-telling: Studies in the development of narrative
Ransome, Arthur
Fiction -- History and criticism; Narration (Rhetoric); Storytelling -- History
The heroine sits in a square watching children, and reflects,
always in the concrete, how much the Vicomte is going to bore
her, and on the terrible danger of rendezvous, and so on, making
pictures all the time. At last, when she is three-quarters of an
hour late, she gets up and sets out for his rooms. She has not gone
ten steps before she meets a diplomatic baron, of whose character
in her eyes de Maupassant has been careful to let us have a hint
beforehand. He asks her, after the usual politenesses, to come and
see his Japanese collections. He is an adroit person this baron.
He does not make love to her. He laughs at her. He ends, after a
delightful little dialogue, in half hurrying, half frightening her
into a cab. They have scarcely started when she cries out that
she has forgotten that she had promised her husband to invite the
Vicomte to dinner. They stop at a post office. The baron goes
in and gets her a telegram card. She writes on it in pencil--it
would be vandalism to spoil the message by translating it from the
French--she writes:
'Mon cher ami, je suis très souffrante; j'ai une névralgie
atroce qui me tient au lit. Impossible sortir. Venez diner
demain soir pour que je me fasse pardonner.
JEANNE.'
She licks the edge, closes it carefully, writes the Vicomte's
address, and then, handing it to the baron, 'Now, will you be so
good as to drop this in the box for telegrams.'
There de Maupassant ends, without comment of any kind. His stories
have always 'the look of a gentleman,' and know how to move, when
to stop, what to put in and what to leave out. They are impersonal,
but not more impersonal than Mérimée's. There is a man behind them,
and in contradistinction to the school of writers with whom he has
been confounded, he does not blink the fact, but obeys Flaubert's
maxim, allowing his presence to be felt but keeping himself
invisible. De Maupassant, the pupil of Flaubert, makes even clearer
than his master the intimate connection between those apparently
hostile things, Romanticism and Realism. Lesser and coarser minds
may have needed the stimulus of a revolt when none was; but the
great men on the heights knew that the suns of dawn and sunset were
the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account