A history of the American people, Vol. 2 [of 5] : $b Colonies and nation — John Shaqi
A history of the American people, Vol. 2 [of 5] : $b Colonies and nationWilson, Woodrow
History
A history of the American people, Vol. 2 [of 5] : $b Colonies and nation
Wilson, Woodrow
United States -- History
[Illustration: AN ENGLISH FLEET IN 1732]
The main lines of trade ran, after all, straight to the mother country,
and were protected when there was need by English fleets. Both the laws
of Parliament and their own interest bound the trade of the colonies to
England. The Navigation Act of 1660, in force now these forty years,
forbade all trade with the colonies except in English bottoms; forbade
also the shipment of their tobacco and wool anywhither but to England
itself; and an act of 1663 forbade the importation of anything at all
except out of England, which, it was then once for all determined, must
be the _entrepôt_ and place of staple for all foreign trade. It was
determined that, if there were to be middlemen’s profits, the middlemen
should be English, and that the carrying trade of England and her
colonies should be English, not Dutch. It was the Dutch against whom the
acts were aimed. Dutch ships cost less in the building than ships built
in England; the Dutch merchantmen could afford to charge lower rates of
freight than English skippers; and the statesmen of King Charles, deeming
Holland their chief competitor upon the seas and in the markets of the
world, meant to cut the rivalry short by statute, so far as the English
realm was concerned.
Fortunately the interests of the colonists themselves wore easily enough
the harness of the acts. For a while it went very hard in Virginia, it
is true, to pay English freight rates on every shipment of tobacco, the
colony’s chief staple, and to sell only through English middlemen, to the
exclusion of the accommodating Dutch and all competition. Trade touched
nothing greater than the tobacco crop. Virginia supplied in that alone
a full half of all the exports of the colonies. Her planters sharply
resented “that severe act of Parliament which excludes us from having
any commerce with any nation in Europe but our own”; for it seemed to
put upon them a special burden. “We cannot add to our plantation any
commodity that grows out of it, as olive trees, cotton, or vines,”
complained Sir William Berkeley very bluntly to the government in 1671.
“Besides this, we cannot procure any skilful men for one now hopeful
commodity, silk: for it is not lawful for us to carry a pipe stave or
a barrel of corn to any place in Europe out of the King’s dominions.
If this were for his Majesty’s service or the good of his subjects, we
should not repine, whatever our sufferings are for it; but on my soul,
it is the contrary for both.” But the thing was eased for them at last
when they began to see how their interest really lay. They had almost
a monopoly of the English market, for Spanish tobacco was kept out by
high duties, the planting of tobacco in England, begun on no mean
scale in the west midland counties in the days of the Protectorate, was
prohibited by law, and a rebate of duties on all tobacco re-exported
to the continent quickened the trade with the northern countries of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account