A history of the American people, Vol. 2 [of 5] : $b Colonies and nationWilson, Woodrow
History
A history of the American people, Vol. 2 [of 5] : $b Colonies and nation
Wilson, Woodrow
United States -- History
with him and served him; and it was his statesmanship and his use of
English arms that had made England’s dominion complete and England’s
colonies safe in America.
[Illustration: A PAGE OF “POOR RICHARD’S” ALMANAC]
[Illustration: BENJAMIN FRANKLIN IN A COLONIAL DRAWING ROOM]
English fleets and armies had not been sent to America, however, and
equipped for warfare there, sustained in war season and out of it,
without enormous expense; and that expense, which had set the colonies
free to live without dread of danger or of confinement at any border,
England had borne. It had been part of Mr. Franklin’s plan of union,
proposed at Albany, that the congress of the colonies should sustain the
armies used in their defence and pay for them by taxes levied in America;
but that plan had been rejected, and this war for the ousting of the
French had been fought at England’s cost,—much as the colonies had given
of their own blood, and of their own substance for the equipment of their
provincial levies, and much as they had suffered in all the obscure and
painful fighting to protect their frontiers against the redskins, far
away from set fields of battle. They had done more, indeed, than pay the
costs which inevitably fell to them. They had “raised, paid, and clothed
twenty-five thousand men,—a number,” if Mr. Franklin was right, “equal
to those sent from Great Britain and far beyond their proportion. They
went deeply in debt in doing this; and all their estates and taxes are
mortgaged for many years to come in discharging that debt.” Parliament
had itself acknowledged their loyal liberality and self-sacrifice,
and had even voted them £200,000 a year for five years, when the war
was over, by way of just reimbursement. But, though they had made
sacrifices, they had, of course, not shared with the royal treasury
the chief outlays of the war. Colonial governors, viewing affairs as
representatives of the government at home, had again and again urged the
ministers in London to tax the colonies, by act of Parliament, for means
to pay for frontier forts, armies of defence, and all the business of
imperial administration in America. But the ministers had hitherto known
something of the temper of the colonists in such matters and had been
too wise to attempt anything of the kind. Sir George Keith, who had been
governor of Pennsylvania, had suggested to Sir Robert Walpole that he
should raise revenue in the colonies; but that shrewd politician and man
of affairs had flatly declined. “What,” he exclaimed, “I have old England
against me, and do you think I will have New England likewise?” Chatham
had held the same tone. What English armies did in America was part of
England’s struggle for empire, for a leading station in power and riches
in the world, and England should pay for it. The desire of the colonies
to control their own direct taxes should be respected. English statesmen,
so far, had seen the matter very much as observant Colonel Spotswood had
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account