A History of the Boundaries of Arlington County, Virginia — John Shaqi
A History of the Boundaries of Arlington County, VirginiaArlington Co., Va. County Manager
History
A History of the Boundaries of Arlington County, Virginia
Arlington Co., Va. County Manager
Arlington County (Va.) -- Boundaries
[62] _Code of Virginia, 1950_, Title 7.1, Sec. 7. This
Commission dealt only with the boundary below Jones Point but
chose _low water mark_ as the line. The pertinent words of
the agreement (ratified by Virginia in 1878) are: "The low
water mark on the Potomac to which Virginia has a right in the
soil, is to be measured ... from low-water mark at one headland
to low water at another, without following indentations, bays,
creeks, inlets, or affluent rivers. Virginia is entitled not
only to full dominion over the soil to low water mark on the
south shore of the Potomac, but has a right to such use of the
river...." Interpretation of this agreement took many years and
it was 1930 before the line actually was surveyed and
monumented.
[63] _Code of Virginia, 1950_, Title 7.1, Sec. 7. Cf. also
page 9 above.
The Commission accumulated a large volume of testimony and exhibits and
completed its report[64] in 1935. It found that the "fair and proper
boundary is the low water mark on the Virginia shore running from
headland to headland across creeks and inlets." It pointed out that
inasmuch as the mark of 1791 could not be determined the low water mark
should be accepted as of this day. It suggested that an exception be
made at Roaches Run where the line should run 150 feet west of and
parallel to the west line of the Mount Vernon Boulevard.
[64] Report of District of Columbia--Virginia Boundary
Commission, 74th Congress, 2nd Session, _House Document_ 374.
Several bills[65] were introduced into Congress to give effect to the
decision of the Commission but none was enacted at this time. The
completion of the Airport and the Pentagon Building gave urgency to the
problem: conflicts of jurisdiction hampered law enforcement and
complicated the question of tax collection. Moreover, Virginia was
anxious to insure that the liquor control laws of the State and not
those of the District of Columbia should be in effect at the National
Airport. In 1942, the General Assembly had adopted an Act[66] covering
the boundary question, on the assumption that the bill then pending in
Congress would be passed. Disagreement over the details of the
jurisdiction to be ceded and accepted by Virginia and the United States
Government prevented passage of a Federal Act until 1945 when Public
Law 208 was enacted by the 79th Congress. This was followed by an
Act[67] of the Virginia General Assembly repealing the 1942 Act and
ratifying the 1945 Federal Act.
[65] 76th Congress, 3rd Session, H.R. 9976; S. 4114. 77th
Congress, 1st Session, H.R. 1045; H.R. 5073. 78th Congress, 1st
Session, S. 19; H.R. 746; H.R. 3664. The Arlington County Board
endorsed H.R. 9976; cf. Minute Book V, p. 423 and VII, p. 500.
[66] Acts of Assembly, 1942, Chapter 267.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account