A History of the British Army, Vol. 2: First Part—to the Close of the Seven Years' WarFortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
A History of the British Army, Vol. 2: First Part—to the Close of the Seven Years' War
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Great Britain -- History, Military; Great Britain. Army -- History
Meanwhile affairs had assumed a far more dangerous complexion.
Charles had been active in summoning the leaders of the clans on
which he counted; and though less favourably received than he had
hoped he had secured Cameron of Lochiel, Macdonald of Keppoch,
Macdonald of Glengarry, and others. On the 16th of August a
party of Keppoch's and Lochiel's men succeeded in cutting off
two companies of the Royal Scots which were on their way to Fort
Augustus, killed a dozen of them, and took the rest prisoners:
and on the 19th, the very day of Cope's departure from Edinburgh,
Charles raised his standard at Glenfinnan, to find himself on the
next day at the head of sixteen hundred men.
Cope had not yet received full intelligence of these transactions,
but it was pretty evident to him that his advance to the north was
likely to be something more than a mere military promenade, and
he became extremely unwilling to execute it. Yielding, however,
to positive orders from the Lords-Justices[202] he continued his
march upon Fort Augustus, not a little disgusted to find that,
though he had encumbered his train with several hundred stand of
arms for distribution to loyal volunteers, no such volunteers were
forthcoming to receive them. Charles, for his part, on receiving
information of Cope's approach, with great promptitude made a
forced march to Corry Arrack, the worst pass on the road, and
having disposed his troops with great skill, waited exultingly
for the coming of the red-coats that he might overwhelm them
during their passage of the defile.[203] To his surprise not a man
appeared. Cope had been made aware of his dispositions and had
turned aside from Dalwhinnie to Inverness, leaving the road to
the south open to the rebels. From Inverness he despatched urgent
messages to Edinburgh for transports to convey his troops southward
by sea.
Cope has always been greatly blamed for this movement, the
contention being that he should either have maintained his ground
in front of Charles or have fallen back on Stirling. All critics,
however, overlook the crucial points, that not only was his force
inferior to that of the rebels but that he could not trust a man
of them. Charles's Highlanders could march two miles to Cope's
one, and would have made short work of a large convoy in charge of
undisciplined troops. Again, if Cope had halted, the rebels would
have been on him in a few hours before he had had time to entrench
himself, even supposing that he could have found entrenching tools.
The fact that he sent for transports shows that he would not rely
upon his troops in a retreat; the advance northward was undertaken
contrary to his advice, and the misfortune that followed was
simply the usual result of civilians' interference with military
operations.
[Sidenote: Aug. 30/Sept. 10.]
[Sidenote: Sept. 4/15.]
[Sidenote: Sept. 11/22.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account