A History of the City of Brooklyn and Kings County, Volume I.Ostrander, Stephen M.
History
A History of the City of Brooklyn and Kings County, Volume I.
Ostrander, Stephen M.
Brooklyn (New York, N.Y.) -- History; Kings County (N.Y.) -- History
DEAR FRIENDS--Whereas, on the date of this 10th day of February,
1654, a peticion is presented to the cort hereby, Johannes Van
Beeck, that the banns (of matrimonie) between him and Maria
Varleth, may bee hear registered and bee properly proclaimed,
and wee hav understoode that the same Johannes Van Beeck ande
Maria Varleth had prevusly too this maide procklemation of thare
banns throgh youre cort att Gravesende wich (under Koncison) is
contrarie too the stile and customes of oure Faderland. Itt is
oure requeste to youre honourable cort in case such an ockacion
should ockur in futur, that wee mai bee inn formed kincerneing
the same, inn order on ether sydde to preventee all
impropriertys, which allso wee engaige too doo on our parte
spechally iz the praktize and custome off our Faderland that any
one shal maike three procklamations inn the plaice ware his
domercile is, ande then he maye bee maryed werever hee pleases,
wherein wee ar ande remaine your right Honourable Lordships'
affectionate friend.
ARENT VAN HATTAN.
Bye order of thee Burgomasters and Shepens of New Amsterdam.
Attest
JACOB KIPP, Sec'ty.
AMSTERDAM IN NIEW NETHERLANDS, this 10th day of February, 1654.
The next step taken by the candidates for matrimony was their appearance
before the Court. This event in the old manuscripts is recorded as
follows:--
"Casper Varleth and Johannes Van Beeck appeared inn cort and
praed most ernestly thatt onn thee perticion and remonstrance
konserning the marriage between Johannes Van Beeck and Maria
Varleth presented too the Burgomasters and Schepens may be
disposed off, and in konsequence of the Bench note being
kompleate itt iz posponed untill Thursda next, soe az inn thee
meantime too notifie the other Lordships.
"Johannes Van Beeck appeared in cort and requested az before
thatt acion maye bee had onn his peticion, offering furthermore
iff thort nesary att thee time ande the okeacion too bee readie
to affirme under oathe whatt he stated inn his peticion,
repeating especially three conversacions hadd with his
Excellencie Petrus Stuyvesant."
The subject-matter of the petition was important, and could not be
hastily passed upon. The Burgomasters deliberated for three days, and
doubtless viewed the subject in every phase and light imaginable. At
last they reached a conclusion which cannot be better presented than in
the precise language of the decision rendered:--
"Bye the Burgomasters and Shepens of niew amsterdam--having been
seen and examined the peticion as presentede too our cort, onn
the 10th ande 16th days of this month, tochinge the bonds off
matrimonie between Joh Van Beeck and Maria Varleth. Tharefore
wee inquire into,
"First--Who frome the beginning was the institutor of marriage,
ande also whot the apostels off thee Gentiles teaches thareon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account