A History of the Durham Miner's Association 1870-1904Wilson, John
History
A History of the Durham Miner's Association 1870-1904
Wilson, John
Coal miners -- Labor unions -- Great Britain -- History; Durham Miners' Association -- History
Dear Sir,--I am desired to inform you that the present state of the
coal trade in Durham seems to render it imperative to extend the
hours of work and increase the facilities for drawing coal. And that
the members of this Association would be glad to discuss the matter
with you and your Committee with a view to arriving at some decision
on the subject.
Could you fix Thursday next, the 21st, at two o'clock to meet our
Committee here? An answer at your earliest convenience will oblige.
The Executive met the employers as requested, and found that the
change was to increase from ten hours to eleven all the collieries
working ten hours, that drawing time being the outcome of an
arrangement. The owners were reminded that it was inconsistent with
the sliding scale, and the demand should be withdrawn. They replied by
quoting a portion of the scale: "Both parties shall remain at liberty
to raise any question not inconsistent with the maintenance of the
sliding scale." "Should any dispute arise as to the carrying out of
these arrangements the question in dispute shall be submitted to the
chairman of the Joint Committee, who, if he cannot act, shall appoint
some other umpire to act in his place. The award in either case to be
final." These were discussed at great length; finally three proposals
suggested by the Executive Committee, subject to the approval of their
members, were agreed to:
1st. Is it consistent with the sliding scale to even discuss a
lengthening of the hours?
2nd. If it is consistent with the sliding scale to discuss the
matter, is it necessary to lengthen such hours?
3rd. If the hours are lengthened, should there follow any increase in
wages, and if so, how much?
The Committee were not sure whether the full body of owners would
agree to them, as those present at the meeting objected to No. 2 being
a question of reference. They informed the lodges that Mr Meynell had
fixed 9th April for the hearing of the case. They were convinced that
the employers could make the demand under the arrangements, and
therefore all that was necessary was to say how many persons should
attend and who they should be. The question was eventually placed in
the hands of the members of Joint Committee to make the best
settlement they could. On 15th April Mr Meynell gave the following
award:--
COAL DRAWING
(_Award_)
Whereas the Durham Coal Owners' Association, being of opinion, that
it is absolutely necessary that the working hours of all men and boys
above 16 years of age should be increased, if they thought fit to
place it before me, and to leave me to decide the question. And
whereas it was also agreed that the following questions should be
left to me for my decision:--
1st. Is it consistent with the sliding scale to discuss a lengthening
of the hours?
2nd. If it is consistent with the sliding scale to discuss the
matter, is it necessary to lengthen such hours?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account