A History of the Four Georges and of William IV, Volume IIIMcCarthy, Justin H. (Justin Huntly)
History
A History of the Four Georges and of William IV, Volume III
McCarthy, Justin H. (Justin Huntly)
Great Britain -- History -- 1714-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1714-1837
indifferent to the American colonies as if they were situated in the
mountains of the moon. The major part of the small minority that
really did seek or desire information about America gained it from the
same poisonous sources that inspired the Government, and based their
theories of colonial reform upon the peevish epistles, often mendacious
and always one-sided, which fed the intelligences of the Lords of
Trade. The few who were really well informed, who had something like
as accurate an appreciation of the colony of Massachusetts as they had
of the county of Middlesex, were powerless to counteract the general
ignorance and the more particular misconception. It was the cherished
dream of authority in England to bring the colonies into one common
rule under one head in such a way as to strengthen their military force
while it lessened their legislative independence. It now seemed as if
with the right King and the right Ministry {82} this dream might become
a reality. In George the Third and in George Grenville prerogative
seemed to have found the needed instruments to subjugate the American
colonies.
[Sidenote: 1765--Trade restrictions upon the colonies]
Many of the grievances of the colonies were grave enough. If some of
the injuries that England inflicted upon her great dependency seem
petty in the enumeration, a number of small causes of irritation are no
less dangerous to peace between nations than some great injustice. But
lest the small stings should not be enough, the Government was resolved
that the great injustice should not be wanting. The colonists resented
the intermittent tyranny and the persistent truculence of the most part
of the royal governors. The colonists resented the enforced
transportation of criminals. The colonists resented the action of
Great Britain in annulling the colonial laws made to keep out slaves.
It is melancholy to reflect that the curse of slavery, for which
Englishmen of later days often so bitterly and so rightly reproached
America, was unhappily enforced upon a country struggling to be rid of
it by Englishmen who called themselves English statesmen. The
colonists resented the astonishing restrictions which it pleased the
mother country to place, in what she believed to be her own interest,
upon colonial trade. These laws commanded that all trade between the
colonies should be carried on in ships built in England or the
colonies. This barred out all foreigners, especially the Dutch, then
the chief carriers for Europe. They compelled the American farmer to
send his products across the ocean to England. They forbade the
exportation of sugar, tobacco, cotton, wool, indigo, ginger,
dyeing-woods to any part of the world except to England or some English
colony. They only allowed exportation of fish, fur, oil, ashes, and
lumber in ships built in England or the colonies. They forced the
colonists to buy all their European goods in England and bring them
over to America in English vessels.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account