A History of the Four Georges, Volume I — John Shaqi
A History of the Four Georges, Volume IMcCarthy, Justin
History
A History of the Four Georges, Volume I
McCarthy, Justin
Great Britain -- History -- 1714-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1714-1837
The Whigs and the Tories represent in the main not only two political
doctrines, but two different feelings in the human mind. The natural
tendency of some men is to regard political liberty as of more
importance than political authority, and of other men to think that the
maintenance of authority is the first object to be secured, and that
only so much of individual liberty is to be conceded as will not
interfere with authority's strictest exercise. Roughly speaking,
therefore, the Tories were for authority, and the Whigs for liberty.
The Tories naturally held to the principle of the monarchy and of the
State church; the Whigs {18} were inclined for the supremacy of
Parliament, and for something like an approach to religious equality.
[Sidenote: 1714--Political change] Up to this time at least the Tory
party still accepted the theory of the Divine origin of the king's
supremacy. The Whigs were even then the advocates of a constitutional
system, and held that the people at large were the source of
monarchical power. To the one set of men the sovereign was a divinely
appointed ruler; to the other he was the hereditary chief of the realm,
having the source of his authority in popular election. The Tories, as
the Church party, disliked the Dissenters even more than they disliked
the Roman Catholics. The Whigs were then even inclined to regard the
Church as a branch of the Civil Service--to adopt a much more modern
phrase--and they were in favor of extending freedom of worship to
Dissenters, and in a certain sense to Roman Catholics. According to
Bishop Burnet, it was in the reign of Queen Anne that the distinction
between High-Church and Low-Church first marked itself out, and we find
almost as a natural necessity that the High-Churchmen were Tories, and
the Low-Churchmen were Whigs. Then as now the chief strength of the
Tories was found in the country, and not in the large towns. So far as
town populations were concerned, the Tories were proportionately
strongest where the borough was smallest. The great bulk of the
agricultural population, so far as it had definite political feelings,
was distinctly Tory. The strength of the Whigs lay in the
manufacturing towns and the great ports. London was at that time much
stronger in its Liberal political sentiments than it has been more
recently. The moneyed interest, the bankers, the merchants, were
attached to the Whig party. Many peers and bishops were Whigs, but
they were chiefly the peers and bishops who owed their appointments to
William the Third. The French envoy, D'Iberville, at this time
describes the Whigs as having at their command the best purses, the
best swords, the ablest heads, and the handsomest women. The Tory
party was strong at the University of Oxford; the Whig party was {19}
in greater force at Cambridge. Both Whigs and Tories, however, were in
a somewhat subdued condition of mind about the time that Anne's reign
was closing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account