A history of the Irish poor law, in connexion with the condition of the peopleNicholls, George, Sir
History
A history of the Irish poor law, in connexion with the condition of the people
Nicholls, George, Sir
Poor laws -- Ireland -- History
_Objections to cumulative voting, &c._—“It might perhaps be sufficient
to say, in answer to the objections which were made to cumulative
voting, voting by proxy, and constituting magistrates _ex-officio_
guardians, that the Irish bill follows in these cases the example of
the English Poor Law Amendment Act. There are, however, weighty
reasons in favour of each of these provisions, some of which it may
be useful to notice.
“With respect to cumulative votes, it may be observed, that the raising
and disbursing of a poor-rate involves nothing political, but is to
be regarded rather in the light of a mutual assurance, in which the
community joins for the purpose of being protected against the
effects of pauperism, each member contributing in proportion to his
means, and each having an interest according to the amount of his
contributions. If therefore the amount contributed be the measure of
each ratepayer’s interest, it ought in justice also, within certain
convenient limitations, to be the measure of his influence; and
these limitations the bill provides, by fixing a scale according to
which every ratepayer is entitled to vote. As regards the voting by
proxy, such a power is necessary for enabling the owner to protect
his property, his interest in which is permanent, although he may
not always be present to represent it by his personal vote; and the
bill therefore provides for his doing so by proxy. The occupier is
always present, and may vote in person; not so the owner, whose
interest would be unprotected without this power of voting by proxy.
That the owner’s interest ought to be represented will not be
denied. The rate is levied upon property, and thus in fact becomes a
portion of the rent, which would be increased by the amount of the
rate, if this were not levied for Poor Law purposes; so that in
reality it is the landlord, the permanent owner of the property, who
finally bears the burthen of the rate, and not the tenant or
temporary occupier. It seems consonant with justice therefore, that
every facility should be afforded to the owner for protecting his
interest by his vote.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account