A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 2, Jan.-Sep. 1809 : $b From the battle of Corunna to the end of the Talavera campaignOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 2, Jan.-Sep. 1809 : $b From the battle of Corunna to the end of the Talavera campaign
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
the old Jacobin general Lecourbe, Macdonald who--though they did not
know it--had just been taken back into favour by the Emperor, and
Dupont, who was in prison and incapable for the moment of helping
himself or any one else[336]. They also spoke of sending for Moreau
from America, and placing him at the head of the whole movement.
But it is clear that they were not in actual communication with the
generals in France, much less with the exiled victor of Hohenlinden.
The whole plan was ill-considered; it was the result of the intense
irritation against Soult and Bonaparte felt by the officers of the
army of Portugal, acting upon the disordered ambition of a knot
of intriguers. Anger and vain self-confidence blinded them to the
inadequacy of their resources.
[334] Napier and Le Noble both hint that Loison was in the
plot, and perhaps Delaborde, though they do not actually name
these officers. But I think that their innocence is proved by
Argenton’s declaration to Wellesley (Wellesley to Castlereagh,
May 7, Record Office), that Loison was attached to Bonaparte, and
would certainly seize Soult if he proclaimed himself king for
‘ambitious abuse of his authority and disobedience to his master.’
[335] This, at the time, was Wellesley’s eminently sensible
conclusion. He wrote to Castlereagh on April 27, ‘I doubt whether
it will be quite so easy as their emissary thinks to carry their
intentions into execution: I also doubt whether it follows that
the successful revolt of this one corps would be followed by
that of others, and I am convinced that the method proposed
by M. D’Argenton would not answer that purpose.’ _Wellington
Dispatches_, iv. 276.
[336] These are the names omitted in the printed version of the
_Wellington Dispatches_: that of Moreau does not occur there, but
is to be found in the confession which Argenton made to Soult:
see Le Noble, p. 236.
It was a main condition of the projected outbreak that Soult’s
position should be made impossible: the most favourable course of
events, so the conspirators held, would be that he should persist
in his monarchical ambitions and proclaim himself king. When he did
so, the party loyal to Bonaparte among his officers would make an
attempt--successful or unsuccessful--to seize his person. Chaos and
civil strife within the army would result, and it was then that the
conspirators intended to show their hand. It would seem that their
Machiavellian foresight went so far that they proposed to wait till
the Marshal should be imprisoned, or should find himself involved
in hostilities with the Bonapartists, and then offer him the aid of
their regiments, on condition that he should put himself at the head
of the anti-imperialist movement. All this was too ingenious for
practical work. But the next development of the plot was even more
astonishing in its futile cunning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account