A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
But the real quarrel was between Soult and King Joseph. The first
was in a sullen and captious mood, because the King had caused him
to evacuate his much-prized viceroyalty in Andalusia, by refusing to
join him there in September. But Joseph was at a much higher pitch of
passion; not only did he still remember all Soult’s disobedience in
July and August, which (as he thought) had led to the unnecessary loss
of Madrid, but he had a new and a much more bitter grievance. Some time
before the Army of the South reached Valencia, he had become possessed
of the dispatch to the minister of war which Soult had written on
August 12th, in which he hinted that the King was meditating treachery
to his brother the Emperor, and had opened up negotiations with the
Cortes in order to betray the French cause[112]. This document--as has
been explained above--had been given by Soult to a privateer captain
bound from Malaga to Toulon, who had been forced to run into the
harbour of Valencia by the British blockading squadron. Not knowing the
contents of the document, the captain had handed it over to the King,
when he found him at Valencia. Thus Joseph was aware that the Marshal
had accused him, on the most flimsy evidence, of betraying his brother.
He was justly indignant, and had contemplated, in his first outburst
of rage, the arrest and supersession of Soult. His next impulse had
been to send off his confidential aide-de-camp Colonel Deprez, to seek
first the minister of war at Paris, and then the Emperor himself in
Russia[113], with his petition for vengeance. ‘Je demande justice. Que
le Maréchal Soult soit rappelé, entendu, et puni[114].’ If his enemy
had appeared at Valencia early in September, he would probably have
taken the most extreme measures against him. But three weeks had gone
by, his anger had had time to cool, and he could realize the danger
of attempting to seize and deport a marshal whose army was double the
size of his own and Suchet’s combined, and who had a powerful faction
to support him among his own generals. Joseph hoped that a mandate
for Soult’s recall and disgrace would soon be on its way from Russia,
and meanwhile curbed his temper, ignored the Marshal’s recent charges
of treachery, and contented himself with treating him with coldness,
and overruling many of his proposals, on the mere formal ground of
discipline. He was the commander-in-chief, and could accept or reject
the suggestions of a subordinate as he pleased. Soult was no longer
three hundred miles away, as he had been in June, and orders given
by a superior on the spot could be enforced, unless the Marshal were
prepared to break out into open insubordination.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account